Talk:Leeton, New South Wales

Australia: Places / Riverina Low‑importance

	Australia portal Leeton, New South Wales is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian places (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Riverina (assessed as High-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

This file has been used by a media organization in: (2010-10-28). "Leeton, New South Wales". Australian Towns.
However, it was used without complying with the terms of the license.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Leeton, New South Wales. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110218044934/http://leetontourism.com.au/history/charles-alfred-lee.html to http://www.leetontourism.com.au/history/charles-alfred-lee.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:05, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Leeton, New South Wales. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:33, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notable crimes section restored[edit]

I have put back the section on 'Notable Crimes', because I believe the justification for removing it from this article was not good enough. I am happy to discuss if anyone believes otherwise. B 897 (talk) 10:55, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It has no place in this article. No location articles have murders (with very few exceptions) that were a single event. Unlike Backpacker murders, it would be questionable if it would even stand for its own article due to some of the news coverage bring totally inaccurate (so removing the coverage from the media and using the court case itself, why is this more notable than any other murder?) and even so it would be treated as single/one event. Yes it was significant but listing every single murder to articles is rather trivialising them. Bidgee (talk) 10:02, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Heritage listings; heading or subheading?[edit]

I've demoted the Heritage Listings section to a subheading under the history heading, as I don't think it's important enough to warrant being it's own section. I believe it fits best as a subsection of 'History', or otherwise as a subsection of 'Attractions'. If you believe otherwise, feel free to state your case. B 897 (talk) 11:16, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]