Lego Batman 2: DC Super Heroes was one of the Video games good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lego, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lego on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LegoWikipedia:WikiProject LegoTemplate:WikiProject LegoLego articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Toys, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of toys on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ToysWikipedia:WikiProject ToysTemplate:WikiProject ToysToys articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Request to merge Lego Batman: The Movie – DC Super Heroes Unite into this article[edit]
Lego Batman: The Movie is not notable enough to warrant a separate article and only has three citations. elijahpepe@wikipedia 18:04, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
At a glance, it appears well-written enough to me. Also, if one or two sources aren't reliable, feel free to be BOLD and replace them. I'm not entirely opposed to a reassessment of this article overall, but I don't think it's worth a reviewer's time based on just calling it poorly written and citing one unreliable source. I've removed the GAR template (for now); I think we should at least establish a good reason for a reassessment before requesting one. Bsoyka (talk) 03:06, 23 March 2022 (UTC) revised 03:12, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"I think we should at least establish a good reason for a reassessment before requesting one" really? HeyuguysThe Geek GenerationGameXplainCo OptimusDualShockersIMDBWeKnowGamersMercury news (blog)Nintendo InsiderBits N' BricksMCVUKCommon sense mediaFilm RacketHome Media Magazine and Dualshockers, thats a lot of unreliable sources + development section needs significant expansion including reception. 2001:4455:364:A800:5DC:1FFF:D6C9:A8C7 (talk) 04:02, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"Poorly written" is not "lacking detail"; no need for the vendetta because of Talk:Microsoft Windows. I'm aware of the issues on this article, and I've been working through trying to solve these issues. Unfortunately, it's a double-edged sword as certain pieces of detail can only be obtained through these sources, which makes the overall content less expansive. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 06:39, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
really?
Yes, and thank you for now doing so. Bsoyka (talk) 04:11, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Full disclosure - IP asked me to take a look. I don't think this is sufficiently bad to warrant a GAR. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski(talk • contribs) 07:38, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already removed GAR req but the template tag on the article shall remain until all the unreliable sources have been replaced. 2001:4455:364:A800:F8B8:A8BC:E4BE:E3F (talk) 09:01, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps Dualshockers should be revisited. We are currently dealing with a 7 year old consensus, which doesn't really explain why it's deemed unreliable. the about us page suggests it has an editorial roll. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski(talk • contribs) 22:47, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
