Talk:Leslie Carter

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Education[edit]

There is no mentioning of her education. She attended Cross Creek Manor in La Verkin, Utah as the same time as me. 81.19.225.98 (talk) 09:47, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Esquire article[edit]

Can anyone find a copy of the 2001 Esquire article mentioned in the section about her album?RafikiSykes (talk) 20:13, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Photo could now be added?[edit]

from [1] Some copyrighted images may be used on Wikipedia, providing they meet both the legal criteria for fair use, and Wikipedia's own guidelines for non-free content. Copyrighted images that reasonably can be replaced by free/libre images are not suitable for Wikipedia. All non-free images must still meet each non-free content criteria; failure to meet those overrides any acceptable allowance here. The following list is not exhaustive but contains the most common cases where non-free images may be used.

Pictures of deceased persons, in articles about that person, provided that ever obtaining a free close substitute is not reasonably likely. RafikiSykes (talk) 20:25, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Daughter[edit]

An editor has removed the name of Carter's daughter. As this information is publicly cited in a host of WP:RS publications, it's not private information. The editor wrote "MINOR CHILD" in caps, but I can find no policy regarding this; Wikipedia:Child protection is an unrelated policy about children using Wikipedia. Comments? --Tenebrae (talk) 18:48, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen this come up in a few articles. Normally they mention the guidelines below.RafikiSykes (talk) 21:04, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
3.7 Privacy of names
Shortcut:
WP:BLPNAME
Caution should be applied when identifying individuals who are discussed primarily in terms of a single event. When the name of a private individual has not been widely disseminated or has been intentionally concealed, such as in certain court cases or occupations, it is often preferable to omit it, especially when doing so does not result in a significant loss of context. When deciding whether to include a name, its publication in secondary sources other than news media, such as scholarly journals or the work of recognized experts, should be afforded greater weight than the brief appearance of names in news stories. Consider whether the inclusion of names of private living individuals who are not directly involved in an article's topic adds significant value. The presumption in favor of privacy is strong in the case of family members of articles' subjects and other loosely involved, otherwise low-profile persons.
The names of any immediate, ex, or significant family members or any significant relationship of the subject of a BLP may be part of an article, if reliably sourced, subject to editorial discretion that such information is relevant to a reader's complete understanding of the subject.

Sources[edit]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Leslie Carter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:07, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]