Talk:Lethbridge Collegiate Institute/GA2
GA Review[edit]
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Criteria taken from Wikipedia:Good_article_criteria
1. Well-written[edit]
(a) the prose is clear and the spelling and grammar are correct
Several grammatical errors throughout. Here are just a few examples:
- On December 13, 2007, a note was found handwritten in a washroom stall. (should be "On December 13, 2007, a handwritten note was found in a washroom stall.")
- The most advertised is the exchange Japan; LCI regularly exchanges students with Sapporo Commercial High School,[46] an institution which has also been informally twinned with LCI in a program implemented by Alberta Education.
(b) it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation
Overall: 
2. Factually accurate and verifiable[edit]
(a) it provides references to all sources of information in the section(s) dedicated to the attribution of these sources according to the guide to layout
- References 33, 34 and 44 are dead. This was mentioned in this assessment.
(b) it provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons-science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines
Contains relevant references and quotations throughout, with additional notes on some content
(c) it contains no original research
Overall:
3. Broad in its coverage[edit]
(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic
(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)
- Perhaps less detail is required in the Extra-curricular activities section. School song is completely irrelevant considering it is no longer in use.
Overall:
4. Neutral[edit]
It represents viewpoints fairly and without bias.
- No problems found. Meets this criteria.
Overall: 
5. Stable[edit]
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
- No edit wars. Only recent problem was one good faith edit.
Overall:
6. Illustrated, if possible, by images[edit]
(a) images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content
- File:LCI2.JPG - Public domain, released by creator
- File:Lethbridge_Central_School.jpg - Public domain, copyright expired
- File:Goshen.png - Some rights reserved (share alike and attribution)
- File:LCI_window.jpg - Public domain, released by creator
- File:Teamflag1.jpg - Non-free image with fair use rationale
- File:LCI22.JPG - Public domain, released by creator.
(b) images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions
File:LCI2.JPG - Relevant; no caption- File:Lethbridge_Central_School.jpg - Relevant (under heading Early years); suitable caption
- File:Goshen.png - Somewhat relevant; unable to verify accuracy; caption does not explain image
- File:LCI_window.jpg - Relevant; caption may need to be rewritten to include what the stained glass represents
- File:Teamflag1.jpg - Irrelevant - caption is sketchy and I cannot see any information in the paragraphs immediately surrounding the image which refer to it. Caption says these logos are embroidered onto most athletics uniforms - perhaps could be moved to Athletics section. No justification for using a non-free image here.
- File:LCI22.JPG - Little relevance in illustrating the Performing Arts Centre
Overall:
7. Conclusion[edit]
This article does not meet the following points of the good article criteria:
- 1(a)
- 2(a)
- 3(b)
- 6(b)
Overall: - Article fails assessment