Talk:Lichte

Reliable sources, undue weight, and referencing

Wikipedia has certain standards because it is an encyclopedia. They are not "my" standards, and they include not blowing things out of all proportion (undue weight); not using self-published sources or books that cannot be shown to exist; and adding an accurate reference (not translated or with the spelling changed, and with complete publication info and preferably the page number) so that readers can verify the information. Local history journals, old books available only in pdf, newspaper reports - all of these are fine. It's no problem if it's in a foreign language. But it must be in teh article and the article must present the facts in a balanced and accurate manner. The Brödel book is not listed in either the German National Library or OCLC Worldcat. Perhaps tehre is a suitable reference in the book by him that is listed there? or in some other source? But in any case, people who never actually lived in Lichte should not be listed in a section on people associated with the place. Nor should local academics (or athletes or any other class of people) who are not notable enough to have their own article. Yngvadottir (talk) 15:10, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Lichte, Porcelain princess 2010, 2010-07-25.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Lichte, Porcelain princess 2010, 2010-07-25.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Lichte, Porcelain princess 2010, 2010-07-25.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:03, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lichte. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120330232254/http://www.porzellangeschichte.de/content/thueringer-porzellankunst-aus-dem-lichtetal-ausstellung-eisfeld-stadtmuseum to http://www.porzellangeschichte.de/content/thueringer-porzellankunst-aus-dem-lichtetal-ausstellung-eisfeld-stadtmuseum

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:59, 15 May 2017 (UTC)