Talk:Lifestyle anarchism

Rationale for shorter entry

I removed a paragraph that was added in good faith. That paragraph contained some useful exposition on this entry, but the entry was too long for an entry on a pejorative term used by a few people. The entry does include 4 citations and three external links, so anybody who wants to learn more about this topic can easily find more information. It should be noted that this entry has been tagged as a "low importance philosophy" article, so it's not far removed from being a non-notable article. I would prefer that this article be deleted, but I can compromise if the article is kept short. Chuck0 (talk) 04:05, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

I'm happy enough to accept this strategy. The added paragraph was only a passing mention of the term and of dubious quality. I will add additional content to the article only if I can find a comprehensive, even-handed and impartial account of the term that adds encyclopediac value. скоморохъ 04:13, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Lifestyle Anarchism

tO the contrary,

I propose an expansion of the article-- and a revision of the definition: 'lifestyle anarchism' is not merely the attendance to the superficialities of subcultures such as punk or goth musical subcultures which have a anti-authoritarian or anti-social perspective, but rather is the deliberated and conscientous objection of people of any class and background to illegitimate authority or hierarchies founded on unsound values. As such, 'lifestyle anarchism' is a philosophy which promotes a consciousness of individual consumption, and its impact in empowering corporations, businesses, governments, and organizations and the hierachies and authority they derive from such empowerment. It may be seen as a realization of a 'Middle-Way' or 'Third Way' philosophy, -- the realization that total economic independence in a world of complex, global interconnections is impossible, and likewise that zero consumption is impossible short of death, which forces individuals to consider their consumer ideology and reasoning (rather than merely express disdain for the term 'consumer', which is at best a superficial rejection of the 'Status Quo')... I will begin working towards such an expansion. -- 0101Roger0101 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.51.85.203 (talk) 21:14, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lifestyle anarchism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110523111651/http://www.infoshop.org/inews/article.php?story=03%2F07%2F18%2F3115851 to http://www.infoshop.org/inews/article.php?story=03%2F07%2F18%2F3115851

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:22, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lifestyle anarchism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080223164754/http://www.infoshop.org/inews/article.php?story=2008spain-interviews-chuck to http://www.infoshop.org/inews/article.php?story=2008spain-interviews-chuck

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:05, 23 December 2017 (UTC)