Talk:Light rail in Canberra

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

ACTivate consortium[edit]

While the IRJ[1] and ABC[2] cites list Keolis, Downer and Keolis Downer as members of the ACTivate consortium, probably being taken from the Canberra Metro press release,[3] the consortium’s website[4] and that of Keolis[5] and Plenary[6] indicate Keolis' having no involvement in its own right, its only interest being through its shareholding in Keolis Downer. 220.101.99.88 (talk) 00:32, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move?[edit]

I propose moving this article to Light rail in Canberra. The project's official website no longer uses the name Capital Metro and the proposed title has the advantage of being generic and easily understood. Gareth (talk) 03:58, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds like a good idea to me Nick-D (talk) 09:40, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Update. @Geramany: just move this page to Canberra Metro. For the reasons mentioned above, I still think that Light rail in Canberra is a better title. Canberra Metro is potentially somewhat confusing, given the line is not, in fact, a metro. The page linked in the OP is still called "Light Rail Network" and mentions that "Canberra Metro are the delivery partners building stage one of Canberra’s light rail". Canberra Metro is the consortium constructing/operating the line - similar to ALTRAC in Sydney and GoldlinQ on the Gold Coast. I see no evidence the system will be branded as Canberra Metro. Gareth (talk) 08:09, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Agree article should be moved back to Light rail in Canberra. Tapioz (talk) 06:18, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Light rail in Canberra. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:06, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Canberra Metro Operations article merge[edit]

Propose merging Canberra Metro Operations article into the Operations section of Light rail in Canberra. Baylion9 (talk) 10:14, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good call. The Drover's Wife (talk) 15:10, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Happy with that - if more info can be found in future it can be split off again, but a good alternative at the moment. Bookscale (talk) 13:08, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:08, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Article name[edit]

Somebody moved this article to Canberra Metro, a name that is never used for it. The article probably should be moved back to Light rail in Canberra, but I can't move it because a redirect needs to be deleted. Grahame (talk) 11:43, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done It's best to ask for an admin to fix process problems like this via a post at WP:AN or WP:ANI or asking an admin you know rather than make an unnecessary move. Nick-D (talk) 11:03, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks.--Grahame (talk) 12:04, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]