Talk:Lilo & Stitch (franchise)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Image copyright problem with Image:Hanako.JPG[edit]

The image Image:Hanako.JPG is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --10:31, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal[edit]

I come with this proposal to merge the following characters into a List of Lilo & Stich characters:

This is because none of these characters have managed to prove notability outside the Lilo & Stich series and related media (like Kingdom Hearts). None of these articles have sections with coverage by reliable secondary sources discussing the characters individually (apart from the films) or showing impact in popular culture. Thoughts? --LoЯd ۞pεth 06:51, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since there was no opposition within one week and there was no improvement of the articles, then the characters are merged into the list. --LoЯd ۞pεth 02:48, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stitch Returns and Back (2014)[edit]

this is a Direct-to-video film about Jookiba is killed in Electricity by Hämsterviel, After Death of Jumba, Grand Councilwoman, Orders, Forcing and Sending Stitch to the Mission, It Must Have to Accomplished before It's Too Late. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.44.124.59 (talk) 05:33, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Harry potter[edit]

Why are harry potter cast here — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.102.93.78 (talk) 10:44, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lilo and Stitch 3: Lilo's New Adventure[edit]

Either part of this 'film' does not appear to exist anywhere but here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.133.202.172 (talk) 13:40, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion of possible interest at Talk:List of experiments from Lilo & Stitch[edit]

This is just a note to interested editors that I have started a discussion at Talk:List of experiments from Lilo & Stitch#Inclusion of Stitch! experiments seeking consensus regarding an issue in that article. Interested editors are welcome to provide their opinion at the discussion there. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:42, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Lilo & Stitch (franchise). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:17, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]