Talk:Linde–Buzo–Gray algorithm

Robotics Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RoboticsWikipedia:WikiProject RoboticsTemplate:WikiProject RoboticsRobotics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

What is the difference between LBG and K-means? Memming 05:04, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

According to [1], LBG is like the batch mode of K-means. Does K-means supposed to be online mode? Memming 15:33, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

LBG uses Lloyd's algorithm to refine the codebook after splitting each vector in the codebook in two. Holzklöppel (talk) 20:34, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What is the difference between LBG and Lloyd's algorithm? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.184.75.153 (talk) 10:41, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What does LGA mean? Lensi (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 08:40, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I assume they wanted to abbreviate "Generalized Lloyd Algorithm". Holzklöppel (talk) 20:35, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I just want to "vote" and say that LBG is an important vector quantization algorithm... one of the most (behind k-means) cited alorithms. Of course this is just based on my personal experience and I have no statistics to back this up...Hydradix (talk) 14:58, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing, Content need improvement[edit]

I rewrote the lede of the article to be what I (not a subject-matter expert) considered comprehensible and added a pseudocode description as per WP:ALGO. The article still needs more sources than the one I used to gain an understanding of the algorithm, details and general information is also missing. I am dissatisfied with the pseudocode and feel the algorithm would be better represented in prose, but MOS says pseudocode. Holzklöppel (talk) 08:12, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]