Talk:List of Australian federal elections

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Image copyright problem with File:Its-time-poster-small.gif[edit]

The image File:Its-time-poster-small.gif is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --22:04, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Chronology of Australian federal parliaments[edit]

I propose to merge Chronology of Australian federal parliaments into List of Australian federal elections. They appear to share much of the same information but require twice the updating in the event of a new election (such as now). sroc (talk) 10:15, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Disagree: There is some overlap, because elections and parliaments have an intimate constitutional relationship - but not so much as to warrant a merge. The existence of duplicated information is not a reason in itself to merge articles. Duplication is an inherent feature of a comprehensive encyclopedic coverage of related topics. The Chronology article is primarily focussed on the Parliaments, and many of the dates shown there have nothing whatever to do with general elections. -- Jack of Oz ... speak! ... 11:26, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


  • As this has been dormant since September 2010, I consider the matter closed and I'm removing the merge tag from the Chronology article. -- Jack of Oz [your turn] 05:16, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why do we need both a list article and a chronology article? Seems very overlapish... Timeshift (talk) 02:27, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

LNP[edit]

As 5 of the LNP attend the National caucus meetings and 16 attend the Liberal caucus meetings, should this be indicated on the table under the 2010 line? Orderinchaos 07:47, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keating's photo needs replacement[edit]

Every prime minister on this list has a roughly contemporary photo except Paul Keating. The photo currently used on this page was obviously taken decades after he was prime minister. For the sake of accuracy and consistency, his photo should be changed to something from the time of his prime ministership. I can't make this change myself because I'm unfamiliar with using Wikipedia. (122.106.207.125 (talk) 13:06, 7 May 2018 (UTC))[reply]

 Done Ivar the Boneful (talk) 13:32, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]