Talk:List of Big Ten Conference football champions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Can we please leave co champs in Alpha order Smith03 15:04, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

purdue was co champions with michigan because prior to 1946 the big ten did not count ties. so a team with a 5-0-1 record would be viewed as winning percentage of 1.000 same as Michigan with a 6-0 record 1.000 please read the second paraga on page 1 of this purdue football media guide [1]

Smith03 (talk) 16:50, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how to edit, but for 2009 Ohio State should be noted to only have clinched a share of the Big Ten title. They still need to win against Michigan next week (11/21/09) to clinch the sole possession of the conference title. Several teams could share the crown if Michigan (somehow) beats Ohio State.

-WyoBuckeye

BCS Ranking[edit]

What about adding BCS rankings to the Championship by Year list? --Flyguy33 (talk) 15:54, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This list shows year-end data only. There are no BCS rankings at the end of the season. The last BCS rankings are before the bowls. Jweiss11 (talk) 16:05, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

question[edit]

what is the purpose of the * next to some teams in the year by year section Smith03 (talk) 18:37, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Note: an asterisk denotes a national championship for that season recognized by the College Football Data Warehouse. See: NCAA Division I FBS National Football Championship#College Football Data Warehouse recognized national champions" Jweiss11 (talk) 18:41, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

thanks is that somewhere in the article i did not see it Smith03 (talk) 18:52, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

i found it Smith03 (talk) 18:53, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of Big Ten Conference football champions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:24, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]