Talk:List of European Court of Human Rights judgments

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Human rights High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

What cases should be included?[edit]

This page has started with a sampling of cases, but is not perfect. Opinions will be appreciated on what topics should be included and which cases are notable. This may provide some rough ideas about section structure:Key case-law extracts: European Court of Human Rights, by Gilles Dutertre, Council of Europe 2004 ISBN 9287150559 [1] although too dated to be used for specific cases. Please suggest relevant cases below. Thank you. History2007 (talk) 13:26, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with this approach. Please see the discussion at Talk:European_Court_of_Human_Rights#WP:BRD. In my opinion, this article should be based only on secondary and tertiary sources. It should not be a collection of cases that some Wikipedia Editors consider interesting.--Gautier lebon (talk) 15:42, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Answer: "needs work, not talk". In the summary on the ECHR I listed 3 books that have listed key decisions. There are even more such published lists. It is now a question of looking up those lists in the books and matching with what there is on the page, one step at a time. History2007 (talk) 15:53, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I fully agree with you. The approach you outline above is excellent. Unfortunately I am not at present able to do the work because I have other priorities. Hopefully other people will join this discussion and contribute to improving the article.--Gautier lebon (talk) 08:51, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of European Court of Human Rights judgments. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070701132323/http://cmiskp.echr.coe.int/tkp197/search.asp?skin=hudoc-en to http://cmiskp.echr.coe.int/tkp197/search.asp?skin=hudoc-en

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:37, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]