Talk:List of Georgia Confederate Civil War units

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Here's the only other one of these I found: List of New York Civil War regiments. They split Cavalry & Infantry. I hope to do that when I get some more with their nicknames. Jolomo 19:41, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of Georgia Confederate Civil War regiments. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:17, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Needs Serious Work to Update[edit]

This page is badly disorganized and out of sync. There are 2 different Infantry sections §1 and §10. Some of the units listed in one of these 2 sections does not appear in the list of the other. The table in §10 makes a sad attempt to show the organizational structure of the different regiments by showing their parent Brigade units at only 3 battles/campaigns. But, these units were shuffled around from brigade to brigade so often, you'd need a column for virtually every battle (or timeframe). The 18th Georgia Volunteer Infantry, for instance, stayed a part of the Hood's Texas Brigade up until the Battle of Antietam (September 17, 1862). But that's not even mentioned. Cobb's Brigade was referred to as the Georgia Brigade (also the 1st Georgia Brigade), which then moved to Wofford, and later others. I'd recommend, since this table would require a hurculean effort to correct, that it should be removed, and the regiments listed should be merged into §1at the top. Any thughts? TadgStirkland401 (TadgTalk) 22:08, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I just merged section 1 and section 10. But now as I look at the rest of this list, I am seeing Legions and Battalions listed. They do not belong on a list about Regiments. I'll wait before I edit this, but it needs more serious updating. TadgStirkland401 (TadgTalk) 00:38, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This several volume list of books is a great resource for this list. Take a peek here. TadgStirkland401 (TadgTalk) 00:41, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that the later sections with their tables could need some work. Or be deleted altogether as the units are essentially just a repetition from the upper sections in a format with little consistency. I also just undid your merge, good faith as it was. With your merge you deleted several units altogether, like e.g. three of the four 1st Infantry regiments and all of the battalions. Please be a little careful with those. As far as legions and battalions go, all independent Georgia units belong here, it isn´t limited to regiments. Don´t hang yourself up on the title with regiment being just the most common organisatorial type that could be substituted with unit (as is the case in several of those lists). ...GELongstreet (talk) 01:02, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@GELongstreet: Thanks for the revert. Didn't realized I missed so much. But if we are going to list ALL independent units, the page name needs to change and the lede statement as well. I don't mind, they just need to change to stop the possibility of misleading folks. TadgStirkland401 (TadgTalk) 01:16, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
And ... moved. By the way all other Confederate lists had been at the units format already. ...GELongstreet (talk)
@GELongstreet: This site might come in handy as a reference. It was sent to me from a Georgia Facebook site tonight... Have a look. It appears to be wiki-like in its format. But it might have useful sources listed. Family Searcg website --TadgStirkland401 (TadgTalk) 04:40, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]