Talk:List of Guggenheim Fellowships awarded in 1929
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of Guggenheim Fellowships awarded in 1929. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120825025406/http://www.gf.org/fellows/results?query=&lower_bound=1929&upper_bound=1929&competition=ALL&fellowship_category=ALL&x=22&y=12 to http://www.gf.org/fellows/results?query=&lower_bound=1929&upper_bound=1929&competition=ALL&fellowship_category=ALL&x=22&y=12
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:32, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
Deceased?[edit]
Is it necessary to specify that they're all deceased? That's a reasonable inference for anyone receiving a fellowship in 1929 (since most would have been at least 22 at the time, hence at least 111 years old today in 2018), but it doesn't seem very useful to specify this after every name. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RCTodd (talk • contribs) 13:54, 8 February 2018 (UTC)