Talk:List of ICD-9 codes

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

NOS=not otherwise specified--a generic catchall also you will see NEC=not elsewhere classified

somesections will have NEC followed by NOS just incase you didn' find the NEC ambiguous enough!

Published is not necessarily public domain[edit]

http://www.code-xpert.com/ is cited as evidence that these codes are in the public domain; but it really only proves that the codes are published, not that they are in the public domain. ICD cites WHO | International Classification of Diseases (ICD), which says:

ICD-10 classification in various formats such as ClaML and other related materials can be downloaded from our download area. You will need to register and accept the license before downloading.

--DanConnolly (talk) 21:18, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

NOS[edit]

What does NOS mean? By the way, it is now linked to the NOS disambiguation page (links should not be linked disambiguation pages), and I find nothing good in it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cate (talk • contribs) 05:50, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Not Otherwise Specified. Indeed a very confusing term. JFW | T@lk 16:52, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

gjhgljglgluglg 66.0.115.97 (talk) 12:37, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]