This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish cultureTemplate:WikiProject Jewish cultureJewish culture articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article was nominated for deletion on May 1, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.
Question: Why is the fact they would be Jewish relevant?[edit]
On wp:en, there are mainly contributors from English culture and mainly from the US. I'd like to point out that such an article would not be considered politically correct in European culture and discuss this.
The reason is that it sounds extremely discriminatory to point of the cultural affilation of people. How could the fact that a "justice" would be Jew be relevant of anything in any way or would deserve interest.
In Belgium, our Prime Minister (higher level of the executive ; equivalent of President) is gay. I think it is even not mentionned in his wikipedia articles.
The fact a man practices Judaism or has Jewish cultural origins is something that is private, as well as the fact he would be gay, Christian, Atheist, ... The fact a politician is liberal or socailist is on the conrary relevant.
It is not the first time I am amazed by such precisions in articles on wp:en. How is this justifed in anglo-saxon culture to provide such information ? Pluto2012 (talk) 09:38, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Is there any opposition/support to the deletion of this article ? Pluto2012 (talk) 14:56, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I would strongly oppose the deletion of this article. I would be glad to provide my rationale should that discussion occur, but suffice it to say this discussion was previously undertaken in 2007 and the result was keep. Nemesis63 (talk) 19:43, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
And what about my former question ? Pluto2012 (talk) 20:36, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I note that you also strongly oppose discussion. Pluto2012 (talk) 11:57, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
