Talk:List of Johnny Test characters

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of Johnny Test characters article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.
	This article lacks sufficient references and adequate inline citations. Please provide any citations per verifiability and reliable sources.

Veganism and Vegetarianism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of veganism and vegetarianism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Veganism and VegetarianismWikipedia:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismTemplate:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismVeganism and Vegetarianism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Animation: American / Canadian Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).

This article is supported by the Canadian animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).

More information:
/
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.
	This article lacks sufficient references and adequate inline citations. Once the references are added, please remove the `\|unref=` parameter from this template.
	This article has been marked as describing a work or element of fiction in a primarily in-universe style and may require cleanup. Please provide that the fiction more clearly and provide non-fictional perspective.

Fictional characters

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Current sourcing[edit]

Okay, the current sources such as, "Mentioned in many episodes", "See Johnny Long Legs", and "Parodies Darth Vader" appear to be unreliable. They don't utilize any source templates, not to mention they come off as original research. A user adding such information in an Add a reference slot doesn't make it anymore reliable. Creditable third party sources are key here. Otherwise, they just don't belong here. Sarujo (talk) 22:51, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, they do, for the first and final time. If you continue to not accept my editing, you will find your self blocked (echo).

99.19.92.173 (talk) 23:54, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No they are not. And I'd appreciate it if you'll refrain from making threats to other editors. Sarujo (talk) 01:01, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Knock it off Sarujo[edit]

Okay, I already said an unreferenced article doesn't belong on Wikipedia. I proposed a meger, but you didn't listen. Now, I'll just have to propose it for deletion, and this is no idle threat. 99.19.92.173 (talk) 00:52, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Uh no, character lists do not belong in the main article as the main article is only for the series itself. It's development and reception. Your proposals for deletion have no merit, as to why no one will listen to them. The other reason is that we all know that you're really the editor formally known as Warmpuppy trying to start drama for the other editors trying to help these Johnny Test articles, just because you can't have your way with the direction the articles are going. So as a friendly warning, please stop with foolishness before either me or some other is forced to report you. Sarujo (talk) 01:08, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What Warmpuppy? That ship has sailed. Also, I proposed it for deletion for the reasons in there. Add references, or this'll happen. Plus, it's "formerly". Also, I said characters are part of a series, but of COURSE you don't believe me. If this continues, you will be reported, so please stop attacking me.

99.19.92.173 (talk) 02:10, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AH! BTW, you can't contest a deletion. 99.19.92.173 (talk) 02:31, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(Edit Conflict)The only person attacking here is you making idol threats whenever you can't have your way or somebody calls you on a violation. As I recall, you tried adding sources but I removed them as they were unreliable. So now you're resorting to an all out deletion-how childish.

If you don't want every editor on Wikipedia knowing who you are, then you shouldn't make the same foolish mistakes as before. Whining and making administrator threats when your edits are reverted or removed, vandalizing articles and user pages with personal messages just to get under an editor's skin, using lines like "That ship has sailed", using the same method of signing your messages. Also you have no business crossing out another editors comments. Doing such is deemed vandalism, and as you already know I don't make idol threats so I will report you. And another thing, I don't need you pointing out my spelling and grammatical errors.

Shows just how much you claim to know about Wikipedia's rules and guidelines. Any deletion claim can be contested through consensus discussion. Yet you've failed to start any deletion discussion proposing the so-called claims you're making. Claims of acts that you yourself were guilty of making. And another thing, you have never proposed any such merger for this article. So stop making up stuff. Sarujo (talk) 03:29, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fine. I'll remove the deletion. 99.19.92.173 (talk) 21:28, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Foot Fetish[edit]

The following line appears in the Lila Test section:

"...and extremly high red high heels in barefeet, so she is never seen wearing her socks at all. Her toes can be seen in certain episodes only. It still uncertain whether her toes are painted or not, but it is extremely likely that they are not painted at all;"

Not only do I find it unnecessary, but it is subjective ("extremely high heels"), unsourced ("seen in certain episodes only") and speculative ("it is uncertain", "it is extremely likely") and just plain pointless (who cares about her painted nails?). I had previously removed this section of text but it was restored. I am removing it again. It the person defending its presence wishes to restore it, I urge him to discuss it here first.

Sings-With-Spirits (talk) 17:01, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Age Okay so why does it say that johnny, susan and mary are all a year older? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.64.104.4 (talk) 01:45, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

General[edit]

There's a lot of nonsense in here. Someone put a lot of work into it, but there's still a lot of nonsense. I took out a couple unnecessary parenthetical statements A lot of this is here to amuse fans and that's not the purpose of an encyclopedia article. PurpleChez (talk) 20:54, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]