Talk:List of Major League Baseball annual ERA leaders

List of Major League Baseball annual ERA leaders is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

List of Major League Baseball annual ERA leaders is part of the Major League Baseball Triple Crown series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 16, 2010	Featured list candidate	Promoted
July 11, 2010	Featured topic candidate	Promoted

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 27, 2010.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that in 1988, the Major League Baseball ERA title was decided by a margin of less than 1⁄100 of a run between Allan Anderson and Teddy Higuera?

Current status: Featured list

Baseball Mid‑importance

	Baseball portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Adding "In baseball" to lead sentence[edit]

Here's why I think "In baseball" should be added to the beginning of the first sentence. First, I believe the lead sentence of an article should be able to stand on its own to inform the reader, rather than using the article title as a crutch. If uninformed readers read the lead sentence in its current form,

"Earned run average (ERA) is a statistic used to evaluate pitchers, calculated as the mean of earned runs given up by a pitcher per nine innings pitched."

it's not at all obvious that the article's topic is baseball. In fact, now that I look more closely, the word "baseball" isn't used at all in the first paragraph, and isn't used as a stand-alone term in the entire lead section.

Second, the title alone does not tell readers who aren't familiar with ERA precisely in what circles the statistic is used. For all they know, ERA could be used in any bat-and-ball game that has a pitcher, or it could be used only in Major League Baseball. By adding "In baseball", we provide much-needed context to uninformed readers.—tk tk tk 18:58, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Considering that the word "baseball" is in the title of the article, I think the context is already there. Contending that it's not obvious when the word is right there... I don't think that really works. It certainly doesn't hurt anything; I just don't see that it helps anything either. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 19:00, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's the thing, though: the phrase "Major League Baseball" is in the title of the article, not just the word "baseball". After reading the article title and lead section, uninformed readers won't necessarily know that ERA is used in baseball in general and not just in MLB. —tk tk tk 19:15, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think anyone is going to think that it's an MLB-only phenomenon, but I see your point. I'll make the change at the related wins list as well. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 19:20, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, from what I've seen in articles it just seems like standard practice to establish context in the lead as well as the title. Thanks for understanding. :) —tk tk tk 19:34, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Weird linking[edit]

There are a lot of places in the list where a player on the San Francisco Giants is linked to like this: New York Giants. Is there a reason? Nick Garvey (talk) 00:20, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Major League Baseball which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 13:49, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]