Talk:List of The 100 episodes
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of The 100 episodes article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 6 months  |
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
It would be possible to create this article?. Here I found some information about the production of the fifth season that is not in the main article of The 100.--Philip J FryTalk 06:18, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
- If you have enough information concerning production, such as filming, casting, development, etc., and more season-specific material, you are more than welcome to develop these articles. Is there a reason Season 5 would be created before any of the previous seasons? -- AlexTW 08:04, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
- I think that it would be a question of other people to see what season should be created first. I only contribute in what I can. I really do not see a reason to impose the creation of the article of season 5. Well, that's see what happened with The Flash, which only has one article about season 4. I think that the article can exist as long as it complies with the guidelines.--Philip J FryTalk 17:30, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
- Drafts already exist and are being developed for the other seasons of The Flash. I think the focus ought to be on the seasons that have already aired completely, rather than on one that is only several episodes in and would have very minimal content. -- AlexTW 17:46, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
- Based on the amount of content at the linked article, I don't see why the production information couldn't be incorporated into the main article. Do we really need to create an entire article just for a paragraph or two of information? --AussieLegend (✉) 17:59, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
- Drafts already exist and are being developed for the other seasons of The Flash. I think the focus ought to be on the seasons that have already aired completely, rather than on one that is only several episodes in and would have very minimal content. -- AlexTW 17:46, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
- I think that it would be a question of other people to see what season should be created first. I only contribute in what I can. I really do not see a reason to impose the creation of the article of season 5. Well, that's see what happened with The Flash, which only has one article about season 4. I think that the article can exist as long as it complies with the guidelines.--Philip J FryTalk 17:30, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Philip J Fry: @AlexTheWhovian: @AussieLegend: The season has already been issued, the draft is now ready, could you add it to the article? --Franar8 (talk) 00:27, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
- Needs a lot more expansion. Cheers. -- AlexTW 01:48, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
- So does The Simpsons (season 30) but the clear consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Simpsons (season 30) was that article was acceptable in mainspace. This draft is considerably more mature. --AussieLegend (✉) 06:27, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
- That seems to be a "special case". See the recent Black Lightning (season 1) edit-war. Is there now no guide on when a season article can be created? A table on a page is fine? Can I now go create a season page for every television series with just their table? -- AlexTW 16:41, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
- As I stated at the AfD, there never was a specific guideline on what the minimum requirements are. As long as there's a sourced episode table or significant sourced content beyond what is provided in an episode table, there is no reason why an article can't be created. This article has both so it should be good to go. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:50, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
- Personal opinion noted, but that's definitely not the general consensus of the WikiProject Television. A lot more production and release information has always been required, and it's been my opinion that season articles have always been scrutinized a lot harder; one table an article does not make. If either case, this should be discussed at a wider venue. -- AlexTW 02:10, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
- Please show me where it has ever been consensus that we require far more information.
A lot more production and release information has always been required
- That's simply not the case, and I'm looking back to when I started editing TV articles over 10 years ago. At that time it was common to create TV articles that contained little more than an episode table once the LoE page became too large. It was common then to create two types of season articles, the "<Foo> (season x)" types that we create today and "List of <Foo> episodes (season x)" that were only episode tables. It has only been relatively recently in Wikipedia history that we have been pushing a lot more into season articles as a convention. That's not an opinion, that's fact. It's been a lot more recently, months not years, that some editors seem to want an article to be almost GA status before it's accepted into article space. --AussieLegend (✉) 03:53, 7 October 2018 (UTC)- It is time @Alex 21: that the seasons get individual article pages. The List of Episodes page is getting far to long. There is enough information out their for season's 2/3/4 and 5 for casting and production. As seen here, I agree with @AussieLegend:. If you feel that my Season one article doesn't meet your standards of enough information, by all means please add to it rather than drafting the article. B.Davis2003 (talk) 02:17, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
- Personal opinion noted, but that's definitely not the general consensus of the WikiProject Television. A lot more production and release information has always been required, and it's been my opinion that season articles have always been scrutinized a lot harder; one table an article does not make. If either case, this should be discussed at a wider venue. -- AlexTW 02:10, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
- As I stated at the AfD, there never was a specific guideline on what the minimum requirements are. As long as there's a sourced episode table or significant sourced content beyond what is provided in an episode table, there is no reason why an article can't be created. This article has both so it should be good to go. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:50, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
- That seems to be a "special case". See the recent Black Lightning (season 1) edit-war. Is there now no guide on when a season article can be created? A table on a page is fine? Can I now go create a season page for every television series with just their table? -- AlexTW 16:41, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
- So does The Simpsons (season 30) but the clear consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Simpsons (season 30) was that article was acceptable in mainspace. This draft is considerably more mature. --AussieLegend (✉) 06:27, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
- Needs a lot more expansion. Cheers. -- AlexTW 01:48, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Philip J Fry: @AlexTheWhovian: @AussieLegend: The season has already been issued, the draft is now ready, could you add it to the article? --Franar8 (talk) 00:27, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
- B.Davis2003, perhaps, I can agree with that, but as can be noted by the article I've moved to the draftspace, it needs a lot more work. Articles should be worked on as a draft before becoming mainspace articles. Furthermore, your split broke the episodes article and transcluded the entire season article. I'm already adding to it - perhaps take a look at the article's history first before getting unnecessarily angry? -- /Alex/21 02:20, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
- I was in the process of fixing the LOE article, but someone decided to jump in... B.Davis2003 (talk) 02:36, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
- Indeed I did, because the article needed to be worked on in the first place. In the cast of this article, you should have been using the preview button to make sure your edit was valid, so you didn't have to go back and fix the article given the period that it was broken for any visitors to the article. -- /Alex/21 02:39, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
- B.Davis2003, Draft:The 100 (season 1) still exists, if you still wanted to work on it and split the episodes article. -- /Alex/21 01:55, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- I was in the process of fixing the LOE article, but someone decided to jump in... B.Davis2003 (talk) 02:36, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
I've marked Draft:The 100 (season 1) under review at AFC so pinging Philip J Fry AlexTheWhovian AussieLegend to see if that article is sufficient enough for the split. Please provide feedback at the draft. Thanks. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:52, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
- Too many empty sections still, since I last contributed to it. See the section above. -- /Alex/21 21:53, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
- I moved it to the draft space for B.Davis2003 to work on, but they seem to have abandoned the idea after they were so keen on it. -- /Alex/21 21:53, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Splitting Season 7 into a separate article[edit]
Why in the world are we splitting Season 7 and Season 7 only into a separate article? Makes ZERO sense, considering it's the final season and this page will not get any bigger. I've tried to revert but an overzealous editor has reverted me. Can someone explain how this makes any sense at all? Unless you're planning to split every season, this is pointless.Rcarter555 (talk) 21:50, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Rcarter555: All seasons have the potential to be split into their own articles, so calm down. I created the season 7 article because it had significant coverage to pass WP:GNG and have its own page. I didn't start with other seasons first because multiple editors are already developing those articles. Here are the drafts for season 1, season 4, and season 5. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 22:02, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Rank?[edit]
What does the "Rank" column in the season overview list mean? It isn't described or referenced. -- Mikeblas (talk) 01:41, 18 July 2022 (UTC)