Talk:List of The Garfield Show episodes

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Explaining reversion[edit]

I have reverted this article to the last version by 72.90.75.178. I did this because several edits by 72.70.228.51 (talk) appear to be unconstructive, and due to intervening edits, I can't easily revert only the unconstructive ones. Sorry if this seems drastic, but it was the best I could do. If your good faith edit has been inadvertently reverted by this action:

  • Please accept my apologies, and redo your edit.
  • Please provide an edit summary, to help others understand your edit.
  • If you haven't already done so, please consider getting a username. You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free, requires no personal information, and has many benefits.

Thank you. – Wdchk (talk) 00:25, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Season 3?[edit]

Are these episodes for season 3 fake? --Codyrox (talk) 02:25, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of "When In China"[edit]

Since when was an official Facebook page considered "unreliable"? It's an official page. I heard of an edit war about another episode that they had trouble getting on here and the writer's (for the show) blog turned out being a reliable source, making this one of few exceptions for a blog to be a reliable source. Of course, it's justified since he did write the show, after all. But still, it is an official page, much like the Official web site or even (gasp) The Garfield Show Diary (yet, it itself is much like a blog!). So, why not an official Facebook page? Afraid it might be too much like a blog? Afraid you'll be permanately terminated from the site for linking to such a thing? Afraid the big bad admins might block you from the web site for (gasp) a week? Afraid of an edit war starting (better get the cannons!) with another user, even though you could just simply ingore because it's just a web site like YouTube, Twitter, or even Facebook (gasp)? Goodness, don't editors have lives to tend to? And don't block me. It's a free country. Everyone's entitled to an opinion. This is just mine about Wikipedia. What? Is there a new law stating I can't type a bunch of random symbols now or something like that? Too many policies, I suppose. I guess you have strict guidelines (or really enemy-lines) to follow. But, you know, rules are made to be broken. What is this place anyway, communism on the web? If I wanted communism I could move to, well never mind that place. Not even an actual business (if you can call it that) is that strict. And don't block me, either. I ain't (pardon my politically incorrect grammar) no troll. I don't even live under a bridge! Why, you all don't even know who I am, you're so strict. For all you know, I could be Jim Davis himself (creator of the cat, wait a minute, he's not reliable either!)! I could even be Mark Evanier, writer of the show saying this. Why I could even be Philippe Vidal, the director of the program, but I guess they're not reliable, either (I'm not them, either). Wikipedia: The free encyclopedia that anybody can edit, but they can't really do anything because of so many strict "enemy"lines. I still don't see why an official Facebook page isn't a good source, though. Considering the official web site has a link to the thing! Honestly, if the world ran off reliable sources, you wouldn't be able to trust anyone. How do you know the people behind the program are'nt liars? Aren't they human? Oh, right. I forgot. They're space aliens from the planet Jupiter (they're liars there, too)! So, who's to say I'm even reliable? Who's to say I'm not lying as I write this sentence to the question mark at the end? A simple TV show cartoon title. You guys are pathetic (that includes you over there sitting in that recliner). You all should change that term to re-lie-able. Anyway, why isn't an official Facebook page (that's linked to right on the main Garfield Facebook page!) considered reliable?!? Thank you for sitting there reading this with that angry expression on your face ready to block me for sharing personal opinion (but you can't get away with that either, because nobody's entitled to an opinion on here). Insincerely, --75.120.100.157 (talk) 03:42, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting sketchy edits[edit]

I have decided to revert the article to a version made before some apparently unconstructive edits were made:

1. Someone removing all Seasons 1-3 episode descriptions without any explanation.

2. Claims that Season 4 started in 2013, despite nothing showing up that year (at least not in the U.S.).

Also, speaking of Season 4 not starting in the U.S. yet, do we really need lengthy descriptions of some of these episodes? They just seem like spoilers right now (assuming they're correct); furthermore, it's just odd to have descriptions for such episodes but not ones that have already aired, right?

GVO8891 (talk) 04:15, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Okay, now the user who removed the episode descriptions (repeatedly, in fact) has been constantly (up to today) removing definitive articles from some of the episode titles (i.e. Gravity of the Situation → Gravity of Situation). I would report him (probably should have done so sooner), but I don't know where this situation would fall under; I wouldn't want to report it as one thing only to be told that it belongs in another. As someone who's still rather new to Wikipedia protocol, I'd really appreciate any help on what I should do now.

GVO8891 (talk) 21:54, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rodent Rebellion[edit]

There's a special (apparently a one-off, not part of any season) called "Rodent Rebellion".

Sources:

  • [1] (listed as "The Rodent Rebellions")
  • [2] ("The Rodent Rebellions" again)
  • [3]
  • [4]

Not sure how to add it in to the article, as well as which sources I should use. GVO8891 (talk) 00:58, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Correction- Rodent Rebellion is considered to be all of Season 5: [5] GVO8891 (talk) 17:23, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Episodes structure[edit]

I'm sorry but an episode of The Garfield Show actually has only one segment instead of two, so someone should edit this article (I would do it but it's too much work and I'm too lazy). Cartoon Network was always wrong premiering two episodes a day with just one intro and outro, so please edit this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CuldeSac12 (talk • contribs) 15:19, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a source for that?

GVO8891 (talk) 18:15, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of The Garfield Show episodes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:24, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of The Garfield Show episodes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:55, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

why the french episode listing[edit]

why cannot you just edit it to make it the usa episode listing 173.228.198.165 (talk) 21:26, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_The_Garfield_Show_episodes&oldid=1208456974"