This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Toys, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of toys on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ToysWikipedia:WikiProject ToysTemplate:WikiProject ToysToys articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
A member of the Guild of Copy Editors reviewed a version of this article for copy editing. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining!
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forky ended with that interested editors should start a merge discussion. Okay, so here we are. The Forky article is in the same poor state as during the AfD half a year ago (WP:NOTPLOT, WP:OR), and there is nothing noteworthy here that isn't in the character list, esentially making this a bloated stub. The only good reason to keep it as a stand-alone article is if someone says he'll improve it to pass as a WP:SPINOFF. So, any volunteers? Otherwise, I'll redirect it to the LoC soon. – sgeurekat•c 11:44, 11 January 2020 (UTC)2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I find stuff like WP:SPINOFF is meaningless, if this article should remain it should be becuase there is enough coverage on the character to make up a good analisys or reception section.★Trekker (talk) 12:49, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Forky is an established character who also has his own spin-off on Disney+. Sure the article needs improvements, such as condensing some plot of the fourth movie, but Forky should be kept. Yoshiman6464♫🥚 19:22, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per ★Trekker's comments. I still do not believe this character has deep coverage by reliable secondary sources and real impact in popular culture to establish Wikipedia:Notability. --LoЯd۞pεth 15:29, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A quick google search reveal that there are multiple secondary source sources out there which has not been cited into the article yet.
On the other hand and going off-topic, an article that really has me concerned about its poor quality, is Jessie. That should be merged into the main list if no real improvements are made. Haleth (talk) 03:13, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. A quick search turns up more than enough reliable secondary sources to justify a standalone article. — HunterKahn 03:02, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep there's enough secondary sources to pass GNG and have a standalone article. Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 00:03, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep More than enough secondary sources that passes general notability. SuperSkaterDude45 (talk) 16:52, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Should this article include characters in Lightyear (2022)?[edit]
Should this article include characters in Lightyear (2022) or not? Tamptonato (talk) 08:42, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
it should, Lightyear (2022) is a part of the franchise, as noted by its opening credits. Tomeka2 (talk) 09:53, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Should this article include Sputnik's launch?[edit]
I don't see why we would need to specify that. What was written here was an excessive level of detail that was irrelevant to Prospector. If readers want to know more about Sputnik, they can simply click on the Sputnik link that's already in the article. AJFU (talk) 15:19, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It is relevant to Prospector. It might be excessive, but it isn't irrelevant, it's completely relevant to me, about Sputnik's launch onboard an R7-derived launch vehicle, the predecessor of the current-day Soyuz rocket series, and how it affected the Americans and Prospector. --2603:6011:AF44:8F00:DCF3:DD48:D55F:6E0B (talk) 22:04, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not making an edit because perhaps there is a reason this is included. Also I don't think "mode" fits this context either. Tomeka2 (talk) 09:55, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
