This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
In November 2017, User:Jd22292 applied the banner, {{very long}}}, perhaps suggesting this article is too long. (See Wikipedia:Article size.). I believe it is long. However, I think it is not too long: it is a list article that briefly summarizes its subject and there is no "natural" way to split it. (See WP:SPLITLIST.)—GoldRingChip 12:19, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You are correct: I have looked again at the article, and it is simply not possible to reduce the size of the article either. I withdraw my suggestion. jd22292(Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 15:16, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The page most decidedly is too long; and it both feasible and reasonable to split it by century, or decade, or suchlike. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:53, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Best way is to do post-1914 and pre-1914, and then possibly more if appropriate. That represents the constitutional amendment which switched the election of senators from chosen by state legislatures to popular direct elections. I might get around to doing it myself, I might not. If the 17xx to 1914 article that remains is too long, the next obvious split ought to take place around the civil war. Onetwothreeip (talk) 11:30, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
