This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philately, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of philately and stamp collecting on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhilatelyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilatelyTemplate:WikiProject PhilatelyPhilately articles
Yes, but only US Post Office-Yonkers is recognized as a historic building and deemed notable enough to have a Wikipedia article about it. --doncram 20:57, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
related navigation template, and about sourcing[edit]
I removed a negative tag on this article about its sourcing, perhaps related. The content of this list is mainly the post offices that are listed on the U.S. National Register of Historic Places, because those are probably all individually Wikipedia-notable and the list of them is available through the NRIS database. One could add a reference to NRIS for each item separately, but that wouldn't be particularly helpful, it would just make 500 or 900 copies of the same reference. I don't think it is disputed whether any single item on this list belongs here...they are just post offices... and I don't think footnote copies would help. It is not necessary to footnote everything in any article; only assertions which are contentious, disputed or unusual really need to be footnoted. If someone else perceives there to be a sourcing issue, please explain. --doncram 16:35, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Most but not necessarily all of the items are National Register-listed. The bluelink items in this list have separate sourcing at their articles, which doesn't need to be copied to here. The redlink items are all (i think) supported by supporting bluelinks (like is required on disambiguation pages per MOS:DABRL) to NRHP list-articles that use the redlink in context. Those NRHP list-articles are themselves sourced, are based on NRIS, in their identifying the places as being listed on the National Register, establishing their existence as post offices. --doncram 16:40, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Post offices that are historically important, such as that of Charleston, South Carolina, where, with approval from the Postmaster General and the President, I think Jackson, for publicly burning abolitionist mail instead of delivering it.
