Talk:List of Uppsala University nations

Sweden Low‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fraternities and Sororities Low‑importance

	List of Uppsala University nations is part of the Fraternities and Sororities WikiProject, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Greek Life on the Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to International social societies, local organizations, honor societies, and their members. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project page, where you can join the project, and/or contribute to the discussion.Fraternities and SororitiesWikipedia:WikiProject Fraternities and SororitiesTemplate:WikiProject Fraternities and SororitiesFraternities and Sororities articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

I oppose the idea of merging all the pages on Uppsala nations, as I think it would be a better idea expanding the pages themselves. I am currently working on improving the homogenicity of their layout. - Me 2010-09-10 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.243.227.253 (talk) 14:28, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's a bad idea as well. They're stubs, live with it. JASpencer (talk) 22:15, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. They're several hundred years old organizations with a lot of members. They have their own relevance. There's a much better chance that someone will expaned the articles if they're left as they are, than if they're merged into a long list. /Julle (talk) 16:11, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

They are notable enough to deserve their own articles. Maybe it's time to remove the merge templates from the articles now? --Skizzik^talk 21:11, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, no one seems to be interested in explaining why it would be a good idea to merge them. I've removed the templates. /Julle (talk) 13:05, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]