Talk:List of acronyms in the Philippines

This article was nominated for deletion on 19 September 2008 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

This article is written in Philippine English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, realize, center, travelled) and some terms that are used in it (including jeepney and cyberlibel) may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Good resource for lawyers[edit]

This is a very good article, since, as jurist and lawyer, it is very useful in preparing pleadings, inter alia. It saves time to go to the libraries, OPAC, looking for Philippine acronyms.--Florentino floro (talk) 08:06, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

since it is keep...[edit]

Can we at least get rid of the ones that aren't acronyms? maxsch (talk) 16:42, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've gone ahead and removed the items on the various lists that are not acronyms. There doesn't seem to be anything particularly notable about "abbreviations in the Philippines" and they are not covered by the subject of this article. maxsch (talk) 21:25, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Baybayin influence?[edit]

It seems that there's a preference for using the initial syllable for acronyms in the Philippines, rather than just the initial letter.

Could this be because the original writing system (Baybayin) used one character for each consonant-vowel pair? "Initial letter" abbreviations would have been impossible in the old writing system, so people wouldn't think in that style.

Worth mentioning? Any references to back me up? Or is it obvious enough that it could be mentioned as a possibility without needing to be motorcaded with references? Gronky (talk) 23:55, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Acronyms in the Philippines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080515194337/http://www.manilatimes.net/national/2008/may/04/yehey/opinion/20080504opi1.html to http://www.manilatimes.net/national/2008/may/04/yehey/opinion/20080504opi1.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:48, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]