This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
Rather than the “note” at the bottom of the introduction regarding sourcing, which is non-standard for Wikipedia citing off sources, I recommend adding a cite web template in References, citing/footnoting anything in the first para that isn’t just a summary of information in the table, inserting a section break headed “List of aerial victories”, then replacing the “note” with “Wolff is credited with the following aerial victories:<insert citations/footnotes to the pages/websites here >”, followed by the table. That will make it clearer to all readers where all the information comes from. If you’d like a hand with that, just let me know. Also, what makes “The Aerodrome” website a reliable source? Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 20:40, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There was a recent discussion on the use of The Aerodrome as a source here. It was considered OK for up to GA. At least some of the people involved apparently write for Osprey and Grub Street. Zawed (talk) 09:44, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Good grief. I’m losing my mind. I participated in that discussion... Forget that bit. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 10:04, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
