Talk:List of aquarium fish by scientific name

Fishes Mid‑importance

	Fish portal This article is part of WikiProject Fishes, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to Fish taxa. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at WikiProject Fishes. This project is an offshoot of the WikiProject Tree of Life.FishesWikipedia:WikiProject FishesTemplate:WikiProject FishesFishes articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aquarium Fishes High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Aquarium Fishes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Aquarium Fish articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Aquarium FishesWikipedia:WikiProject Aquarium FishesTemplate:WikiProject Aquarium FishesAquarium Fishes articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

merge this page into List of freshwater aquarium fish species[edit]

This page is a replica of the Scientific Name column in the List of freshwater aquarium fish species. The fish listed here but not there should be added to the List of freshwater aquarium fish species and this page should be deleted.--HighFlyingFish (talk) 00:50, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I feel ambivalently about it. I only realized yesterday that this page exists, and I have to admit that my initial reaction was to wonder why it does exist. You do make a valid point about the redundancy. On the other hand, nothing is harmed by having two lists. More specifically, this list does offer a somewhat greater ability to search by Latin name—I can easily imagine a reader who knows the Latin name but not anything else, and who finds it useful to use a list in this format to find more information. There is also the issue of whether any species listed here (I haven't looked) might better go to the lists of marine or brackish species. --Tryptofish (talk) 16:19, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I agree that the list should not be merged, because it could be easier for some readers to use.--HighFlyingFish (talk) 22:19, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gyrinochelius is replaced with Gyrochelius[edit]

The spot where the link to the genus Gyrinochelius is supposed to be is actually Gyrochelius, which is a genus of butterflies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.19.63.105 (talk) 05:07, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]