Talk:List of codices

Lists Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bibliographies High‑importance

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bibliographies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bibliographies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibliographiesWikipedia:WikiProject BibliographiesTemplate:WikiProject BibliographiesBibliographies articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Konstanz Codex[edit]

I deleted this from the list. Information on such Codex is limited. There is no Wikipedia article on the codex. Also I would note that the Codex in question has been chiefly mentioned on a single website which claims to be a 2008 webpage[1] of the University of Königsberg which university was disestablished in 1945, making the validity of the reference questionable. Pending some support for the validity of the Codex, it should not appear here. Franklin Moore 03:05, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

The Book of Kells[edit]

Surely the Book of Kells merits a place on this list? Even though it's more known for its illumination and full-size ornamental pages than for its texts as such, it's probably the best-known Celtic manuscript of all time. /Strausszek (talk) 13:42, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kodeks IV NagHammadi.jpg Nominated for Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Kodeks IV NagHammadi.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 2 October 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:33, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Convert to table[edit]

I think it would be helpful to convert this to a table with dates, language, and other basic info. If there is interest I'll take a stab at it. Rkedge (talk) 18:36, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds worthwhile to me. Sandstein 19:34, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]