Talk:List of current champions in All Elite Wrestling

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contested deletion[edit]

This page should not be speedily deleted because... All Elite Wrestling is the second most important wrestling promotion in the United States. Relevance is given. --TheGoldenRule (talk) 15:08, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notability isn't inherited. This article is a sheer duplication of what's at All_Elite_Wrestling#Championships_and_accomplishments. It's basically a WP:CONTENTFORK. This has been deleted several times before including by AfD. This recreation adds nothing. — Czello 17:26, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Look at the championship pages of other promotions. So they are Notability isn't inherited and WP:CONTENTFORK, too?--TheGoldenRule (talk) 19:07, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how many times I have to show you WP:OTHERSTUFF but this still isn't a valid defense. (But in all likelihood, yes.) — Czello 19:10, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I already RED the article. STOP posting this like a ROBOT!--TheGoldenRule (talk) 19:09, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you read it, why do you keep making other stuff arguments? — Czello 19:10, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relevance is given. --TheGoldenRule (talk) 19:11, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That... isn't a rebuttal. It's also outside of the scope of this Csd. The reason it's been nominated for deletion is because it's a recreation of a deleted article. You haven't addressed that. — Czello 19:12, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Relevance is given. Article is now improved. Leave me alone, wiki stalker--TheGoldenRule (talk) 19:15, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You keep repeating non-sensical arguments which makes me think you haven't understood why this has been nominated for deletion, so let me make it clearer for you. Firstly, you recreated an article that the community decided didn't need to exist. You haven't explained how this is justified. Secondly, your article doesn't add anything new to Wikipedia: it just duplicates what's at AEW. Third, you keep making arguments that say "because other companies have this article, we should too". This is a fallacy, and implies you haven't understood WP:OTHERSTUFF. Please address these issues. — Czello 19:22, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have explained how it is justified: Relevance is given. Article is now improved. AEW is the second most important wrestling promotion in the United States. I don't talk to you anymore.--TheGoldenRule (talk) 19:37, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That does not address any of my points. You don't get to create any old article and say "well it has AEW in the title therefore it's notable". — Czello 19:44, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, cause the article is improved and has all standards that other articles have, too.--TheGoldenRule (talk) 19:56, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think you're still failing to understand. Please address the three points I made above. — Czello 19:58, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I already adressed your points. For the last time: just compare Impact Wrestling with List of current champions in Impact Wrestling. It's the same. Why don't you try speedy deletion on List of current champions in Impact Wrestling?! That's insane. Stop posting your otherstuff.--TheGoldenRule (talk) 20:01, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, you seem to think that just because other articles do this, AEW should too. That's not how Wikipedia works. I'll stop posting WP:OTHERSTUFF once you understand it. — Czello 20:03, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I understand it, but I told you already 5 times that relevance is given because AEW is the second biggest wrestling promotion in the states.--TheGoldenRule (talk) 20:14, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Then you don't understand it. That's not the point at all: it's a logical fallacy to say "this article does something therefore so should we". Let me make this easy for you: what does this article do that isn't already done in AEW? — Czello 20:59, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Let me make this easy for you: what does List of current champions in Impact Wrestling do that isn't already done in Impact Wrestling? Go speedy deletion on List of current champions in Impact Wrestling. --TheGoldenRule (talk) 21:08, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That title isn't a candidate for speedy deletion, while this one was. I think you're still failing to understand why your content was deleted. — Czello 07:09, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

LOL, but it has the exact same quality standards like my article. That's just stupid.--TheGoldenRule (talk) 11:54, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:40, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:56, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:53, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]