Talk:List of defunct international airports

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Aviation: Airports

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the airport project.

tab for north america[edit]

can someone make a tab for north ameica? Wisnu the nerd (talk) 09:35, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lead[edit]

I changed the phrasing of the lead with this edit, because per MOS:BOLD, "The most common use of boldface is to highlight the first occurrence of the article's title word or phrase in the lead section," and the bolded phrase of "list of airports that have had commercial/civil and international air service in the past and no longer have scheduled commercial/passenger operations" is not even close. Uli Elch opted to revert that change with a rationale of "No improvement. Definition now inaccurate." My understanding is that conforming with the manual of style is an improvement, and Uli Elch did not provide any reason grounded in policy or guidelines as to why we should ignore that in this case. ~T P W 13:13, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]