This article is within the scope of WikiProject Puerto Rico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to Puerto Rico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Puerto RicoWikipedia:WikiProject Puerto RicoTemplate:WikiProject Puerto RicoPuerto Rico articles
Oppose. I beleive that it's better if we have a clean and concise list on the main article with a separated and detailed list on this article. The Puerto Rico Federal Affairs Administration is similar to a foreign affairs ministry and it's important to detail its Directors, but not on its main article. The main article already has a clean and concise list of its former Directors while this article has a detailed view. This is accepted on Wikipedia and is not a violation of any rules. —Ahnoneemoos (talk) 22:16, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No, that is not at all what I believe. I believe that this article should never have been split in the first place. Is there a difference? Yes, because in the split, the burden is on you to gain consensus for the new article; in merge, it would be on me to gain consensus to put it into the other article. In other words, the default change. Since this was a split, the default must be to remain with the original article (i.e., separating out the list). Qwyrxian (talk) 01:33, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Wikipedia is not paper. Lists of office holders with bells and whistles is a common practice; heck, a huge category is for them. - Altenmann >t 12:19, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]