Talk:List of disputed issues in early Islamic history

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of disputed issues in early Islamic history article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

Wikipedia is not censored.
Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options to not see an image.

This page is not a forum for general discussion about List of disputed issues in early Islamic history. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about List of disputed issues in early Islamic history at the Reference desk.

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Islam Low‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): EbrimaJarjue.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:42, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2006[edit]

Who is going to actually look up this page?--Jersey Devil 22:36, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I don't think that's such a big issue. More importantly... why isn't this cited and why don't we have more substantive debates like when the prophet existed. Date the Qur'an was fully written down? gren グレン 15:29, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Disputed issues in early Islamic history. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051114091437/http://www.imamalinet.net:80/vigenam/moharam1422/en/e2.htm to http://www.imamalinet.net/vigenam/moharam1422/en/e2.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:56, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Disputed issues in early Islamic history. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070902023031/http://encarta.msn.com/encnet/refpages/RefArticle.aspx?refid=761553645 to http://encarta.msn.com/encnet/refpages/RefArticle.aspx?refid=761553645

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:06, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 29 May 2019[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved per lack of objections. (closed by non-admin page mover) DannyS712 (talk) 18:43, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed issues in early Islamic history → List of disputed issues in early Islamic history – Because this is essentially a list article, and I think it should stay that way to stop it becoming a POV-fork in a controversial area – E.g. these "issues" should fully be fully covered in separate WP articles. Britishfinance (talk) 13:25, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

May 2019: Edit Warring[edit]

Some editors seem to be continually edit-warring over this 716-characters edit:

Claims by Muslims that Muhammad was heavily persecuted by polytheists in Mecca and persecuted by Meccans even in Medina. In Understanding Muhammad, Ali Sina dismissed all claims of persecution of Muslims as fabrications by Muslims themselves and said that "even Western authors have fallen into this trap." He cited contradictory stories about the early Muslim "martyrs" as proof of his claims.^[1]
http://www.quranexplorer.com/quran/ Retrieved 11 December 2017.

^ Ali Sina (2008). "The Myth of Persecution". Understanding Muhammad (4 ed.). USA: FaithFreedom Publishing. pp. 17–19. ISBN 9780980994803.

We need to get Talk Page discussion on this edit to help resolve this issue. thanks. Britishfinance (talk) 13:35, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Ali Sina (2008). "The Myth of Persecution". Understanding Muhammad (4 ed.). USA: FaithFreedom Publishing. pp. 17–19. ISBN 9780980994803.

[1]