Talk:List of federal subjects of Russia by GDP per capita

This article was nominated for deletion on 5 October 2019. The result of the discussion was keep.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Russia: Politics and law / Human geography Top‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the politics and law of Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the human geography of Russia task force.

Economics

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles

Why are there differing numbers?[edit]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tatarstan#Economy

Can someone care to explain this to me? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2002:45B4:44B5:1234:C89D:A8E5:4D58:6E54 (talk) 20:22, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of federal subjects of Russia by GDP per capita[edit]

gdp(ppp) has increased 30% since then. data needs update.178.59.206.214 (talk) 17:16, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Map[edit]

The GDP per federal subject map placed in the article lacks Kaliningrad Oblast. --2A00:23C4:C281:A900:980C:59E3:B19D:BC38 (talk) 01:21, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bulls.it[edit]

Let's take St. Petersburg. According to Petrostat (official statistics agency of St. Petersburg) the GDP in the city in 2017 was RUB 3 866 billion. The BIG Mac USD/RUB parity us 23 rubles per USD. The GDP of the city in USD: RUB 3 866 billion / 23 RUB=USD 168 billion. The population of the city on the 1st January was 5.3 mln. The GDP per capita in St. Petersburg: $168 000 million / 5.3 mln=$31 698. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.69.94.123 (talk) 08:58, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's GDP (PPP) per capita, not nominal GDP per capita. Though, I can't say whether it is a correctly calculated regional GDP (PPP) or not...Swarrel (talk) 01:05, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The numbers are unrealistic, especially for the first 3 regions, even given their statistical features.Swarrel (talk) 08:51, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fake data?[edit]

Where these data for federal subjects of Russia came from? I do not see them in sources currently cited on the page. Note that the page was created by an indefinitely blocked contributor. These data look like an outright disinformation. For example, Chechnya receives huge amounts of federal money. Are they counted here? Probably not. My very best wishes (talk) 03:30, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The data could be found here. It's calculated as produced goods/registered population. The first 3 northern regions have a significant number of workers from other regions, which work on a rotational basis and aren't counted as their registered population. Budget transferts also aren't counted, what is important for Chechnya, Ingushetia, Dagestan, Crimea, Sevastopol and some others.Swarrel (talk) 01:01, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The numbers seem to be a way too high, even for PPP. In the file above the first 3 leaders have US$ 100K, 70K and 33K nominal GDP respectively. PPP is higher than nominal, yet obviously not 3-5 times higher.Swarrel (talk) 08:48, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thoughts[edit]

@Daß Wölf: like me, you expressed concern over the relevance of the nation comparison column in the AfD. Do you have any thoughts on how we can proceed, maybe an RfC or something along those lines? Thanks, Willbb234^Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 19:54, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is little to discuss. The list provide some data. You click at the source that suppose to provide these data and see ... no such data. This page is fake created by an indefinitely blocked user, unless someone can provide an RS with data. It's not about relevance of data. There are no such data. Just make it a redirect. End of story. Do not bring disgrace to the project. My very best wishes (talk) 02:54, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Willbb234: I would just remove it here. I would support a removal of all such comparison columns in a RfC if you're willing to draft one. I think it more often than not isn't a meaningful similarity between two countries and falls under WP:SYN. Additionally, thanks to My very best wishes for bringing it up -- I didn't notice it earlier, but even the GDP numbers are unsourced, and I haven't been able to find them anywhere on the internet aside from WP and its mirrors. The reference seems to source the country comparison column and not the federal subject column. Since that makes the page entirely unsourced and possibly a hoax, I support redirecting it to something else, at least until some real numbers can be found. Daß Wölf 19:04, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Page went to nonsense[edit]

Someone needs to delete or fix this page. Nenets autonomous Okrug went from 70,000$ per capita to $200,000, while Moscow is around $125,000? How this even possible? Even New York city has less.

Page has no source for regions.The only source is IMF for comparable countries which doesn't count as source for russian regions

Is it possible that the years are inverted? It seems odd that Russia has lost consistently over the period of time. The other way around it makes much more sense.