Talk:List of graphical methods

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Statistics Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Systems Start‑class High‑importance

	Systems science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the field of Visualization.

Duplicates[edit]

Some of the ones listed in "Simple displays" are duplicated under "Statistics". Should the duplicates be removed? Btyner (talk) 02:45, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No (similarly for duplicates in Business Methods) - either it should be a non-categorised simple list, or duplicates allowed (assuming they point to the same place) in each application category. (Martinb9999 (talk) 14:40, 21 January 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Samples[edit]

Should this page include the simple sample diagram that most (all?) linked pages include? Martinb9999 (talk) 14:45, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

yes, of course it should!

proposal: a graphical index.

this is just the first section, but i propose doing up the whole article like this:

Simple displays[edit]

Area chart

Box plot

Dispersion fan diagram

Graph of a function

Logarithmic graph paper

Heatmap

Histogram

Bar chart

Line chart

Pie chart

Scatterplot

Stemplot

Radar chart

Plotting

Sparkline

dunno what to do with "plotting" but i was avoiding rearranging anything or making decisions on what to keep or toss. also, it turns out that there are numerous subtypes of each chart type. i picked the simplest and most representative example image from each article, although some of these deserve multiple images even if they all link to the same article.

do you hate it? love it? i'm not going to do all the work without knowing whether some self-appointed admin is just going to insta-revert it because "consensus" or "style" 157.131.95.172 (talk) 04:37, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Usage summary[edit]

Should there be a one line summary of the usage of each diagram? Where usages are linked (eg Control Chart points to the existence of error, which Ishakawa Diagram analyses and Pareto Chart prioritises correction of), should this be highlighted? Martinb9999 (talk) 14:45, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]