Talk:List of heaviest spacecraft

References to Mass

Please consider putting the link in the Description column and not in the mass column to keep the look, sorting, and editing streamlined. In the main table if the name link goes to a wikipedia article with the mass listed in its stats (typically on the right) a reference may not be needed as its easy to verify but its still helpful. If not a reference link that contains mass information in the Description is appreciated so that the mass can be verified. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zygerth (talk • contribs) 14:19, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Here is the current guidelines from the table description. "The following are a list of spacecraft with a mass greater than 8,000 kg (17,637 lb), or the top three to any other orbit including a planetary orbit, or the top three of a specific category of vehicle, or the heaviest vehicle from a specific nation. All numbers listed below for satellites use their mass at launch, if not otherwise stated."

Remember the mass column uses the mass at launch of the item in orbit, if not otherwise stated. A Dry Mass column could be added, but these numbers may not be available for all entries. Maybe a link or easy to hover item in the notes.

I have noticed comparing dry mass vs launch mass of the orbiting craft usually doesn't make a difference in ranking. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zygerth (talk • contribs) 14:42, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned references in List of heaviest spacecraft

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of List of heaviest spacecraft's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "SSSM":

• From Shuttle–Mir Program: David Harland (November 30, 2004). The Story of Space Station Mir. New York: Springer-Verlag New York Inc. ISBN 978-0-387-23011-5.
• From Mir: David Harland (30 November 2004). The Story of Space Station Mir. New York: Springer-Verlag New York Inc. ISBN 978-0-387-23011-5.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 20:23, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of heaviest spacecraft. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5il9QixAg?url=http://ston.jsc.nasa.gov/collections/TRS/_techrep/RP1357.pdf to http://ston.jsc.nasa.gov/collections/TRS/_techrep/RP1357.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:54, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Should the X-37B be listed here?

I think it's weight make it fit here. Is it not considered a space craft since it glides to land? Chuck Baggett (talk) 21:04, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

I'd say the X-37B is similar to the space shuttle. I believe its fine to add the heaviest known flight of it. Zygerth (talk) 04:00, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Since it is in LEO it should be over 8000kg.

Duplicate Entries

I'm thinking the entry for "Heaviest commercial geosynchronous communication satellites" is pretty much a duplicate of Telstar 19V the current largest commercial satellite listed. I don't see the usefulness of a generic entry especially as it doesn't even represent a series of satellites. Anyone have a good reason to keep it? User:Zygerth 28 November 2022 — Preceding undated comment added 03:57, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Starship

Should Starship be mentioned here, as it has (almost) reached orbit (880 m/s short), and has a dry mass of 120 tons? Redacted II (talk) 16:04, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

So Ship 25 technically did reach space before it exploded. It is a SubOrbital flight which currently isn't an Orbit category. I believe we could open the SubOrbital can of worms (only the top 3), but SubOrbital's should be restricted to Dry Mass, or the true mass of what made it to space (above 100km). Unlike the other categories, the stage's Wet mass is going to be very different than what actually makes it to space, so that's a reasonable adjustment for SubOrbitals. User:Zygerth (talk) 17 Feb 2023.