Talk:List of highest-grossing animated films/Archive 4

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

new lists/pages

could we start new lists or pages for most expensive animated film and biggest animted bombs. like Most Expensive Film & Box office bomb? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.102.93.78 (talk) 21:19, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Most Expensive animated Film mock list

Most expensive animated films
Rank	Title	Year	Cost (est.) (millions)	Refs & notes
1	Tangled	2010	$260	^[1]^[2]^[3]^[4]
2	Toy Story 3	2010	$200	^[5]^[6]
	Cars 2	2011	$200	^[7]^[8]^[9]
	Monsters University	2013	$200	^[10]
5	Brave	2012	^*$185	^[11]
6	WALL-E	2008	$180	^[12]^[13]
7	Monsters vs. Aliens	2009	$175	^[14]^[15]^[16]
	Up	2009	$175	^[17]^[18]
	A Christmas Carol	2009	$175	^[19]^[20]
	Inside Out	2015	$175	^[21]^[22]
11	How to Train Your Dragon	2010	$165	^[23]^[24]^[25]
	Wreck-It Ralph	2012	$165	^[26]^[27]
	Big Hero 6	2014	$165	^[28]^[29]
14	The Polar Express	2004	$160	^[30]^[31]
14	Shrek the Third	2007	$160	^[32]
16	'TBA	TBA	$TBA	TBA
17	'TBA	TBA	$TBA	TBA
18	'TBA	TBA	$TBA	TBA
19	'TBA	TBA	$TBA	TBA
20	'TBA	TBA	$TBA	TBA
21	'TBA	TBA	$TBA	TBA
22	'TBA	TBA	$TBA	TBA
23	'TBA	TBA	$TBA	TBA
24	'TBA	TBA	$TBA	TBA
25	'TBA	TBA	$TBA	TBA
26	'TBA	TBA	$TBA	TBA
27	'TBA	TBA	$TBA	TBA
28	'TBA	TBA	$TBA	TBA
29	'TBA	TBA	$TBA	TBA
30	'TBA	TBA	$TBA	TBA
31	'TBA	TBA	$TBA	TBA
32	'TBA	TBA	$TBA	TBA
33	'TBA	TBA	$TBA	TBA
34	'TBA	TBA	$TBA	TBA
35	'TBA	TBA	$TBA	TBA
36	'TBA	TBA	$TBA	TBA
37	'TBA	TBA	$TBA	TBA
38	'TBA	TBA	$TBA	TBA
39	'TBA	TBA	$TBA	TBA
40	'TBA	TBA	$TBA	TBA
41	'TBA	TBA	$TBA	TBA
42	'TBA	TBA	$TBA	TBA
43	'TBA	TBA	$TBA	TBA
44	'TBA	TBA	$TBA	TBA
45	'TBA	TBA	$TBA	TBA
46	'TBA	TBA	$TBA	TBA
47	'TBA	TBA	$TBA	TBA
48	'TBA	TBA	$TBA	TBA
49	'TBA	TBA	$TBA	TBA
50	'TBA	TBA	$TBA	TBA

^* Officially acknowledged figure.

References

^ Cite error: The named reference Chmielewski & Eller (2010) was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
^ Cite error: The named reference Corliss (2010b) was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
^ Cite error: The named reference Frankel (2010b) was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
^ Cite error: The named reference Fritz (2010d) was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
^ Cite error: The named reference Corliss (2010) was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
^ Cite error: The named reference Lovell (2010) was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
^ Cite error: The named reference Smith (2011-6-20) was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
^ Cite error: The named reference Fritz (2011-6-27) was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
^ Cite error: The named reference Graser (2011-6-24) was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
^ Cite error: The named reference FilmLA (2013) was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
^ Smith, Grady (23 June 2013). "Box office report: 'Monsters University' scares up $82 million, 'World War Z' shatters expectations". Entertainment Weekly. Retrieved 2 July 2013.
^ Cite error: The named reference Onstad (2008) was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
^ Cite error: The named reference Verrier (2008) was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
^ Barnes, Brooks (10 January 2010). "Taking Aim at the Big Names in Animated Film". The New York Times. Retrieved 18 May 2010.
^ Verrier, Richard (30 March 2009). "'Monsters vs. Aliens' is a hit in three dimensions". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 18 May 2010.
^ LaPorte, Nicole (24 March 2009). "'Monsters' Has More to Fear Than Aliens". The Wrap. Retrieved 18 May 2010.
^ Barnes, Brooks (5 April 2009). "Pixar's Art Leaves Profit Watchers Edgy". The New York Times. Retrieved 27 December 2009.
^ Wloszczyna, Susan (25 May 2009). "Pixar moves on 'Up' with its 10th movie". USA Today. Retrieved 27 December 2009.
^ Barnes, Brooks (25 October 2009). "Disney Hopes 'Christmas Carol' Lives Up to Its Blockbuster Marketing". The New York Times. Retrieved 28 December 2009.
^ "Disney studio executive Mark Zoradi resigns". USA Today. Associated Press. 9 November 2009. Retrieved 28 December 2009.
^ Lang, Brent (17 June 2015). "Box Office: 'Inside Out' Won't Stop 'Jurassic World' Rampage". Variety. Retrieved 4 August 2015.
^ Cunningham, Todd (20 June 2015). "'Inside Out' Rocks 'Jurassic World' with $34 Million Friday at Box Office". The Wrap. Retrieved 4 August 2015.
^ Horn, John (14 March 2010). "'How to Train Your Dragon' and a baptism of fire". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 10 September 2010. {{cite news}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |work= (help)
^ Stewart, Andrew (28 March 2010). "'Dragon' flies to top of box office". Variety. Retrieved 10 September 2010.
^ Frankel, Daniel (25 March 2010). "Friday Box Office: Drag Opening for 'Dragon'". The Wrap. Retrieved 10 September 2010.
^ Corliss, Richard (4 November 2012). "'Wreck-It Ralph' Is Rex and 'Flight' Has Great Liftoff on a Busy Post-Storm Weekend". Time. Retrieved 7 December 2012.
^ Stewart, Andrew (4 November 2012). "Box Office: 'Wreck-It Ralph' smashes record". Variety. Retrieved 9 December 2012.
^ Cite error: The named reference McNary (2014-11-7) was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
^ Cite error: The named reference Hamedy (2014-11-9) was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
^ Cite error: The named reference Lippman (2004-10-1) was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
^ Cite error: The named reference Kehr (2004-10-24) was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
^ Bloomberg News (17 July 2007). "Fifth 'Shrek' may be the last". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 5 January 2010.

Biggest box office bombs for a animated film mock list

Biggest box office bombs
Rank	Title	Production budget	Worldwide gross	Estimated losses ^{[according to whom?]}	Year	Ref
1	Mars Needs Moms	$150,000,000	$38,992,758	$130,503,621	2011	^{[# 1]}
2	Treasure Planet	$140,000,000	$109,578,115	$85,210,943	2002	^{[# 2]}
3	'TBA	TBA	align="right"TBA	TBA	TBA	style="text-align:center;"TBA
4	'TBA	TBA	align="right"TBA	TBA	TBA	style="text-align:center;"TBA
3	'TBA	TBA	align="right"TBA	TBA	TBA	style="text-align:center;"TBA
4	'TBA	TBA	align="right"TBA	TBA	TBA	style="text-align:center;"TBA
5	'TBA	TBA	align="right"TBA	TBA	TBA	style="text-align:center;"TBA
6	'TBA	TBA	align="right"TBA	TBA	TBA	style="text-align:center;"TBA
7	'TBA	TBA	align="right"TBA	TBA	TBA	style="text-align:center;"TBA
8	'TBA	TBA	align="right"TBA	TBA	TBA	style="text-align:center;"TBA
9	'TBA	TBA	align="right"TBA	TBA	TBA	style="text-align:center;"TBA
10	'TBA	TBA	align="right"TBA	TBA	TBA	style="text-align:center;"TBA
11	'TBA	TBA	align="right"TBA	TBA	TBA	style="text-align:center;"TBA
12	'TBA	TBA	align="right"TBA	TBA	TBA	style="text-align:center;"TBA
13	'TBA	TBA	align="right"TBA	TBA	TBA	style="text-align:center;"TBA
14	'TBA	TBA	align="right"TBA	TBA	TBA	style="text-align:center;"TBA
15	'TBA	TBA	align="right"TBA	TBA	TBA	style="text-align:center;"TBA
16	'TBA	TBA	align="right"TBA	TBA	TBA	style="text-align:center;"TBA
17	'TBA	TBA	align="right"TBA	TBA	TBA	style="text-align:center;"TBA
18	'TBA	TBA	align="right"TBA	TBA	TBA	style="text-align:center;"TBA
19	'TBA	TBA	align="right"TBA	TBA	TBA	style="text-align:center;"TBA
20	'TBA	TBA	align="right"TBA	TBA	TBA	style="text-align:center;"TBA
21	'TBA	TBA	align="right"TBA	TBA	TBA	style="text-align:center;"TBA
22	'TBA	TBA	align="right"TBA	TBA	TBA	style="text-align:center;"TBA
23	'TBA	TBA	align="right"TBA	TBA	TBA	style="text-align:center;"TBA
24	'TBA	TBA	align="right"TBA	TBA	TBA	style="text-align:center;"TBA
25	'TBA	TBA	align="right"TBA	TBA	TBA	style="text-align:center;"TBA
26	'TBA	TBA	align="right"TBA	TBA	TBA	style="text-align:center;"TBA
27	'TBA	TBA	align="right"TBA	TBA	TBA	style="text-align:center;"TBA
10	'TBA	TBA	align="right"TBA	TBA	TBA	style="text-align:center;"TBA
11	'TBA	TBA	align="right"TBA	TBA	TBA	style="text-align:center;"TBA
28	'TBA	TBA	align="right"TBA	TBA	TBA	style="text-align:center;"TBA
29	'TBA	TBA	align="right"TBA	TBA	TBA	style="text-align:center;"TBA
30	'TBA	TBA	align="right"TBA	TBA	TBA	style="text-align:center;"TBA
31	'TBA	TBA	align="right"TBA	TBA	TBA	style="text-align:center;"TBA
32	'TBA	TBA	align="right"TBA	TBA	TBA	style="text-align:center;"TBA
33	'TBA	TBA	align="right"TBA	TBA	TBA	style="text-align:center;"TBA
34	'TBA	TBA	align="right"TBA	TBA	TBA	style="text-align:center;"TBA
35	'TBA	TBA	align="right"TBA	TBA	TBA	style="text-align:center;"TBA
36	'TBA	TBA	align="right"TBA	TBA	TBA	style="text-align:center;"TBA
37	'TBA	TBA	align="right"TBA	TBA	TBA	style="text-align:center;"TBA
38	'TBA	TBA	align="right"TBA	TBA	TBA	style="text-align:center;"TBA
39	'TBA	TBA	align="right"TBA	TBA	TBA	style="text-align:center;"TBA
40	'TBA	TBA	align="right"TBA	TBA	TBA	style="text-align:center;"TBA
41	'TBA	TBA	align="right"TBA	TBA	TBA	style="text-align:center;"TBA
42	'TBA	TBA	align="right"TBA	TBA	TBA	style="text-align:center;"TBA
43	'TBA	TBA	align="right"TBA	TBA	TBA	style="text-align:center;"TBA
44	'TBA	TBA	align="right"TBA	TBA	TBA	style="text-align:center;"TBA
45	'TBA	TBA	align="right"TBA	TBA	TBA	style="text-align:center;"TBA
46	'TBA	TBA	align="right"TBA	TBA	TBA	style="text-align:center;"TBA
47	'TBA	TBA	align="right"TBA	TBA	TBA	style="text-align:center;"TBA
48	'TBA	TBA	align="right"TBA	TBA	TBA	style="text-align:center;"TBA
49	'TBA	TBA	align="right"TBA	TBA	TBA	style="text-align:center;"TBA
50	'TBA	TBA	align="right"TBA	TBA	TBA	style="text-align:center;"TBA

Tangled is the most expensive? I wouldn't have guessed. This has no place on this page as this page deals with Highest-grossing films, but you can submit a draft to create a page like this, but make sure you have all your data before you do so. DCF94 (talk) 16:13, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

frist page

here the frist pageMost Expensive animated Film. can u help me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.38.157.176 (talk) 16:40, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

I will try. DCF94 (talk) 03:34, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Is there any more films. or cane I start working on text — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.38.157.176 (talk) 11:49, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

dragon ball gross

I tracking down the dragon ball gross (dose any else know any more?)

Highest-grossing animated franchises and film series^[§] (The films in each franchise can be viewed by selecting "show")

Rank	Series	Total worldwide box office	No. of films	Average of films	Highest-grossing film

18

Dragon Ball

$344,560,000

19

$18,134,737

Resurrection 'F' ($62,760,000)

	Dragon Ball Z series	$314,560,000	15	$20,970,667	Resurrection 'F' ($62,760,000)
1	Resurrection 'F' (2015)	$62,760,000
2	Battle of Gods (2013)	$50,800,000
3	Fusion Reborn (1995)	$23,000,000
4	Broly – Second Coming (1994)	$22,000,000
5	Broly – The Legendary Super Saiyan (1993)	$20,000,000
6	The Return of Cooler (1992)	$19,000,000
7	Super Android 13! (1992)	$19,000,000
8	Bojack Unbound (1993)	$19,000,000
9	Bio-Broly (1994)	$18,000,000
10	Cooler's Revenge (1991)	$16,000,000
11	Lord Slug (1991)	$15,000,000
12	Wrath of the Dragon (1995)	$11,000,000
13	Dead Zone (1989)	$7,000,000
14	The World's Strongest (1990)	$6,000,000
15	The Tree of Might (1990)	$6,000,000

	Dragon Ball series	$30,000,000	4	$7,500,000	The Path to Power ($9,000,000)
1	The Path to Power (1996)	$9,000,000
2	Mystical Adventure (1988)	$8,000,000
3	Sleeping Princess in Devil's Castle (1987)	$7,000,000
4	Curse of the Blood Rubies (1986)	$6,000,000

Corpse (March 29, 2013). "Dragon Ball Box-Office History". World of KJ. Retrieved November 25, 2015.

I don't remember right now where, but I know I found box office figures for the first DB films, except for the '96 one, the total, without the '96 and with Resurrection 'F', was at about $270 million. If Toei Animation decides to make another film, it may get on the list, it depends if & when they decide to release it because there are many new franchises/film series coming out in the next couple of years. DCF94 (talk) 15:51, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

I have sent a message to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_highest-grossing_films#dragon_ball for help

I will search for those figures tomorrow if you want, but as I remember, the '96 film can't have more than $12-$15m judging by the progression of the other films, in any case it doesn't pass Rugrats' $299m. DCF94 (talk) 18:25, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Please do if you get the time also if you already got some of them can you put it the franchise box above.

I actually found a source for all films that puts the series in the top 20. DCF94 (talk) 19:21, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Spongebob movies

Both Spongebob movies are mostly 2D traditional animated films with some live-action scenes. They are definitely not similar to The Smurfs or Alvin & the Chipmunks or Who Framed Roger Rabbit. If spongebob movies are live-action/animation hybrid then please put The Lego Movie on that list too. Paleo cemoski 16:47, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

reed this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_highest-grossing_animated_films/Archive_3#highest_grossing_live_action_-_animated_films_page we had a long talk about spongebob 2 no.1 can be on this list not no. 2 majority of sponge out of water is live action too much. lego only had a couple of live action scenes. even roger had a copule of completely animted scenes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.38.157.176 (talk) 17:16, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Majority of Sponge out of water is not live-action. If you came to this result, just by watching the trailers then please watch the movie. Only the one-fifth of the movie is live-action. Paleo cemoski 17:31, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Even the sponge out of water page says it live action-animated note the live action as well as many other sites A113 animtion, http://m.imdb.com/title/tt2279373/ IMDB, [http://www.slashfilm.com/live-action-spongebob-squarepants-movie/ Slash films — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.38.157.176 (talk) 23:38, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

True, the movie have mixes live-action and trditional animation but it's not a hybrid movie. Like I said before, did you even watched the movie, please answer me. Paleo cemoski 13:16, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Can u stop it a hybrid end of story we do not have films like Garfield orSpace Jam,. Why? Because they are hybrids — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.38.157.176 (talk • contribs) 14:54, 28 November 2015‎ (UTC)

YES! We've been through this with Roger Rabbit, Garfield, Space Jam, SpongeBob. Just because you have different opinion, doesn't change the fact that on this Talk Page there were numerous discussions about those subjects, unfortunately somebody deleted those over time but you can still find them by clicking pn "View history". Tell you what, someone attempted before to create a live-action/animation hybrid page, but he failed. If you feel so strongly about hybrits films, you try and create another draft for "List of highest-grossing live-action/animated films", but you have to manage to bring strong points of why there should be a page like that, cause that's why the last attempt has failed. This page is for animated films only, and if & when we get into a uncertainty of whether a film has it's place or not on this page, we discuss it first on the talk page and not create a mess. DCF94 (talk) 18:07, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

If u want a Highest grossing hybrid films come over & help out — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.38.157.176 (talk) 23:28, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Spongebob movies are not similar to hybrid movies, majority of both SB movies are 2D animation; both characters and enviroment. Paleo cemoski 23:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

It isn't really about if the film is X% animated and X% live action, it is about how it is preceded, we work with sources, and sometimes the sources don't give us the information we need, take ^[1] for example, we know Titanic had a $300+ on its 2012 re-realse but because the source didn't took the re-realse into consideration we can't add it because we don't have the info that Guinness used to creat that top 10. From this first couple of sources that I found ^[2]^[3] it is considered half animated and half live action, evan if it is 80% animated, the sources specifies that traditional animation appears in the "underwater scenes" and in the "live action world" the main characters are brough out as CGI animation with the rest of the scenes being live action (people & locations), this is more or less like Space Jam. DCF94 (talk) 12:05, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Re release question

If some movies are being released, how come the grosses don't go higher. Like for example, why isn't Fantasia's gross climbing higher? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.81.58.55 (talk) 13:26, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Protected edit request on 1 December 2015

This edit request to List of highest-grossing animated films has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Hello - the link to the movie Inside Out is ambiguous - the link should be piped to Inside Out (2015 film).

Thanks very much!

PK T(alk) 18:45, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

@PKT: sorry no one attended to this request. The article is no longer protected. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 14:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Message received, and change made. Thank you, Martin! PK T(alk) 14:07, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Ruling

I see we going by the rule

An animated feature film is defined as a motion picture with a running time of more than 40 minutes, in which movement and characters’ performances are created using a frame-by-frame technique. Motion capture by itself is not an animation technique. In addition, a significant number of the major characters must be animated, and animation must figure in no less than 75 percent of the picture’s running time.

—Rule Seven - Special Rules For The Animated Feature Film Award : I. Definition

Aloeing SOpgbe Bob 2 on this page?

Is there any other films that qualifies now under this rule that did not before like roger, space jam, etc?

We have to check those before we do anything, but I don't think there are any other films that can make it on a list. DCF94 (talk) 20:47, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Space Jam and Who Framed Roger Rabbit are similar to The Smurfs or Alvin & the Chipmunks. They take place at mostly live-action enviroments but with 2D characters. According to Rule Seven, they are not animated movies, both movies are animation/live-action hybrids. Paleo cemoski 00:20, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Qustion

Can't cars & planes cout as a film series aswell like how Highest-grossing franchises and film series got Iron man & MCU, Avengers & MCU?

Like

10	Cars	$1,021,835,545	2	$510,917,773	Cars 2 ($559,852,396)
1	Cars 2 (2011)	$559,852,396
2	Cars (2006)	$461,983,149

20	Planes	$390,424,499	2	$195,212,250	Planes ($239,258,712)
1	Planes (2013)	$239,258,712
2	Fire & Rescue (2014)	$151,165,787

Just wondering? (If not why?)

This will also gives us 25 franchise (the other 21:dragon ball $344.6 million 22: the jungle book $341.5 million 23: Bambi $302.4 millon 24:rugrats $299.6 millon 25:Wallace & Gromit $298.4 millon)

The Planes films are part of the Cars franchise, unlike Iron Man and Avengers who are part of the cinematic universe of MCU but also they are legally their own separate franchise. DCF94 (talk) 17:15, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Classification

The first section of the article has 5 sub-sections and there are few problems with them.

4 of them are animation techniques and the other one is anime (japanese animation), it should be in a different group. We have to delete it or classify highest-grossing animated films in 2 different sections (by technique and by country) but the latter option will make the page much larger.
Maybe we should put 2D computer animation and 3D computer animation in the same sub-section but in different lists.

Paleo cemoski 01:42, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

I may agree with the 2D computer sub-section, they are almost the same thing as they are using softwares as opposed to traditional hand-drawing and stop motion techniques, but with the anime sub-section I've always been unsure, but making a Highest-grossing animation films by country section might not be a good idea. For one thing it will bring a lot of unsurety because some countries may not have good sources or at all to create a Top 10, 20 or 50 animated films, but also this can be material for a separate page, as this is List of highest-grossing animated films, we have a top 50 of all time, we have Tops for each technics, a highest-grossing by year and highest-grossing franchise, I don't think making a highest-grossing by country section is fit for this page, just like making a highest-grossing action/comedy/horror films section is not fit for the List of highest-grossing films page. If anything we should delete the anime sub-section. DCF94 (talk) 13:21, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

I agree, we should delete the anime sub-section. By the way, we need a complete list of animation techniques and sub-techniques before we put 2D and 3D computer animation in the same sub-section.Paleo cemoski 13:25, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

2D and 3D we put them both under the Computer animation sub-section, they are nearly the same thing, a Traditional animation sub-section and Stop motion animation sub-section should be enough. DCF94 (talk) 15:21, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Is there any other animation technique we do not have? Are we get ride of anine & 2D compter animtion — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.38.157.176 (talk) 22:26, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Franchise and series sources

In the References under the Franchise and series sources some of the grosses are source (toy story, kung fu panda, etc) but some (Pokemon,coludy with a chacge of meatballs, etc) do not why? And could/should we ref those other franchies? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.38.157.176 (talk) 12:36, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

peak of Traditional animation

Highest-grossing traditionally animated films
peak	rank	Title	Worldwide gross	Year	Ref
1	1	The Lion King	$987,483,777	1994	^{[# 3]}^{[# 4]}
2	2	The Simpsons Movie	$527,021,022	2007	^{[# 5]}^{[# 6]}
3	1	Aladdin	$504,050,219	1992	^{[# 7]}^{[# 4]}
3	4	Tarzan	$448,191,819	1999	^{[# 8]}^{[# 4]}
2	5	Beauty and the Beast	$424,967,620	1991	^{[# 9]}^{[# 4]}
1	6	Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs	$418,200,000	1937	^{[# 10]}^{[# 11]}
TBA	7	Pocahontas	$346,079,773	1995	^{[# 12]}
TBA	8	The Hunchback of Notre Dame	$325,338,851	1996	^{[# 13]}
9	9	The SpongeBob Movie: Sponge Out of Water †	$323,436,538	2015	^{[# 14]}
TBA	10	Mulan	$304,320,254	1998	^{[# 15]}
TBA	11	Spirited Away	$289,096,678	2001	^{[# 16]}
TBA	12	Lilo & Stitch	$273,144,151	2002	^{[# 17]}
TBA	13	Bambi	$267,447,150	1942	^{[# 18]}
TBA	14	The Princess and the Frog	$267,045,765	2009	^{[# 19]}
TBA	15	Cinderella	$263,591,415	1950	^{[# 20]}
TBA	16	Hercules	$252,712,101	1997	^{[# 21]}
TBA	17	Brother Bear	$250,397,798	2003	^{[# 22]}
TBA	18	Howl's Moving Castle	$235,184,110	2004	^{[# 23]}
TBA	19	The Prince of Egypt	$218,613,188	1998	^{[# 24]}
TBA	20	One Hundred and One Dalmatians	$215,880,014	1961	^{[# 25]}
TBA	21	The Little Mermaid	$211,343,479	1989	^{[# 26]}
TBA	22	The Jungle Book	$205,843,612	1967	^{[# 27]}
TBA	23	Ponyo	$201,750,937	2008	^{[# 28]}
TBA	24	Atlantis: The Lost Empire	$186,053,725	2001	^{[# 29]}
TBA	25	The Emperor's New Groove	$169,327,687	2000	^{[# 30]}
TBA	26	Pokémon: The First Movie	$163,644,662	1998	^{[# 31]}
TBA	27	Princess Mononoke	$159,375,308	1997	^{[# 32]}
TBA	28	An American Tail	$150,000,000	1986	^{[# 33]}
TBA	29	The Secret World of Arrietty	$145,570,827	2010	^{[# 34]}
TBA	30	Peter Pan	$145,000,000	1953	^{[# 35]}
TBA	31	The Rugrats Movie	$140,894,675	1998	^{[# 36]}
TBA	32	The SpongeBob SquarePants Movie	$140,161,792	2004	^{[# 37]}
TBA	33	Anastasia	$139,804,348	1997	^{[# 38]}
TBA	34	The Wind Rises	$136,454,220	2013	^{[# 39]}
TBA	35	The Jungle Book 2	$135,703,599	2003	^{[# 40]}
TBA	36	Pokémon: The Movie 2000	$133,949,270	1999	^{[# 41]}
TBA	37	Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron	$122,563,539	2002	^{[# 42]}
TBA	38	Return to Never Land	$109,862,682	2002	^{[# 43]}
TBA	39	Treasure Planet	$109,578,115	2002	^{[# 44]}
TBA	40	Home on the Range	$103,951,461	2004	^{[# 45]}
TBA	41	Rugrats in Paris: The Movie	$103,291,131	2000	^{[# 46]}
TBA	42	The Tigger Movie	$96,159,800	2000	^{[# 47]}
TBA	43	Lady and the Tramp	$93,602,326	1955	^{[# 48]}
TBA	44	Fantasia 2000	$90,874,570	1999	^{[# 49]}
TBA	45	Fritz the Cat	$90,000,000	1972	^{[# 50]}
TBA	46	Pinocchio	$87,000,862	1940	^{[# 51]}
TBA	47	The Land Before Time	$84,460,846	1988	^{[# 52]}
TBA	48	Fantasia	$83,320,000	1940	^{[# 53]}
TBA	49	Sinbad: Legend of the Seven Seas	$80,767,884	2003	^{[# 54]}
TBA	50	The Road to El Dorado	$76,432,727	2003	^{[# 55]}

I trying to find peak of Traditional animation if anyone cars to find some thanks

It is very difficult because some of the older Disney films had many re-releases and we don't know the exact figures for every re-releases so we can't determine the exact position at that time. DCF94 (talk) 17:57, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

could we give it a try? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.38.157.176 (talk) 17:59, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

We need to find a source for every worldwide re-release of SW, Bambi, Cinderella, etc. and I don't think we will be able to, you can try, but it will be a headache. DCF94 (talk) 18:05, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Cite error: There are <ref group=#> tags on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=#}} template (see the help page).

[Chmielewski_&_Eller_(2010)-1] Cite error: The named reference Chmielewski & Eller (2010) was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[Corliss_(2010b)-2] Cite error: The named reference Corliss (2010b) was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[Frankel_(2010b)-3] Cite error: The named reference Frankel (2010b) was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[Fritz_(2010d)-4] Cite error: The named reference Fritz (2010d) was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[Corliss_(2010)-5] Cite error: The named reference Corliss (2010) was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[Lovell_(2010)-6] Cite error: The named reference Lovell (2010) was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[Smith_(2011-6-20)-7] Cite error: The named reference Smith (2011-6-20) was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[Fritz_(2011-6-27)-8] Cite error: The named reference Fritz (2011-6-27) was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[Graser_(2011-6-24)-9] Cite error: The named reference Graser (2011-6-24) was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[FilmLA_(2013)-10] Cite error: The named reference FilmLA (2013) was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[11] Smith, Grady (23 June 2013). "Box office report: 'Monsters University' scares up $82 million, 'World War Z' shatters expectations". Entertainment Weekly. Retrieved 2 July 2013.

[Onstad_(2008)-12] Cite error: The named reference Onstad (2008) was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[Verrier_(2008)-13] Cite error: The named reference Verrier (2008) was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[Barnes_(2010b)-14] Barnes, Brooks (10 January 2010). "Taking Aim at the Big Names in Animated Film". The New York Times. Retrieved 18 May 2010.

[Verrier_(2009)-15] Verrier, Richard (30 March 2009). "'Monsters vs. Aliens' is a hit in three dimensions". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 18 May 2010.

[LaPorte_(2009)-16] LaPorte, Nicole (24 March 2009). "'Monsters' Has More to Fear Than Aliens". The Wrap. Retrieved 18 May 2010.

[Barnes_(2009b)-17] Barnes, Brooks (5 April 2009). "Pixar's Art Leaves Profit Watchers Edgy". The New York Times. Retrieved 27 December 2009.

[Wloszczynar_(2009)-18] Wloszczyna, Susan (25 May 2009). "Pixar moves on 'Up' with its 10th movie". USA Today. Retrieved 27 December 2009.

[Barnes_(2009c)-19] Barnes, Brooks (25 October 2009). "Disney Hopes 'Christmas Carol' Lives Up to Its Blockbuster Marketing". The New York Times. Retrieved 28 December 2009.

[Associated_Press_(2009)-20] "Disney studio executive Mark Zoradi resigns". USA Today. Associated Press. 9 November 2009. Retrieved 28 December 2009.

[21] Lang, Brent (17 June 2015). "Box Office: 'Inside Out' Won't Stop 'Jurassic World' Rampage". Variety. Retrieved 4 August 2015.

[22] Cunningham, Todd (20 June 2015). "'Inside Out' Rocks 'Jurassic World' with $34 Million Friday at Box Office". The Wrap. Retrieved 4 August 2015.

[Horn_(2010)-23] Horn, John (14 March 2010). "'How to Train Your Dragon' and a baptism of fire". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 10 September 2010. {{cite news}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |work= (help)

[Stewart_(2010)-24] Stewart, Andrew (28 March 2010). "'Dragon' flies to top of box office". Variety. Retrieved 10 September 2010.

[Frankel_(2010)-25] Frankel, Daniel (25 March 2010). "Friday Box Office: Drag Opening for 'Dragon'". The Wrap. Retrieved 10 September 2010.

[26] Corliss, Richard (4 November 2012). "'Wreck-It Ralph' Is Rex and 'Flight' Has Great Liftoff on a Busy Post-Storm Weekend". Time. Retrieved 7 December 2012.

[27] Stewart, Andrew (4 November 2012). "Box Office: 'Wreck-It Ralph' smashes record". Variety. Retrieved 9 December 2012.

[McNary_(2014-11-7)-28] Cite error: The named reference McNary (2014-11-7) was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[Hamedy_(2014-11-9)-29] Cite error: The named reference Hamedy (2014-11-9) was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[Lippman_(2004-10-1)-30] Cite error: The named reference Lippman (2004-10-1) was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[Kehr_(2004-10-24)-31] Cite error: The named reference Kehr (2004-10-24) was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[Bloomberg_News_(2007)-32] Bloomberg News (17 July 2007). "Fifth 'Shrek' may be the last". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 5 January 2010.

[35] ttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_highest-grossing_films#Highest-grossing_films_adjusted_for_inflation

[36] ttp://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/spongebob-movie-sponge-water-film-768839

[37] ttp://wegotthiscovered.com/movies/the-spongebob-movie-sponge-out-of-water-poster-hints-at-live-action-animation-hybrid/

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]

[14]

[15]

[16]

[17]

[18]

[19]

[20]

[21]

[22]

[23]

[24]

[25]

[26]

[27]

[28]

[29]

[30]

[31]

[32]

[# 1]

[# 2]

[1]

[2]

[3]

[# 3]

[# 4]

[# 5]

[# 6]

[# 7]

[# 8]

[# 9]

[# 10]

[# 11]

[# 12]

[# 13]

[# 14]

[# 15]

[# 16]

[# 17]

[# 18]

[# 19]

[# 20]

[# 21]

[# 22]

[# 23]

[# 24]

[# 25]

[# 26]

[# 27]

[# 28]

[# 29]

[# 30]

[# 31]

[# 32]

[# 33]

[# 34]

[# 35]

[# 36]

[# 37]

[# 38]

[# 39]

[# 40]

[# 41]

[# 42]

[# 43]

[# 44]

[# 45]

[# 46]

[# 47]

[# 48]

[# 49]

[# 50]

[# 51]

[# 52]

[# 53]

[# 54]

[# 55]