Talk:List of manufacturing processes

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Links[edit]

There are a lot of bad links on this page that need disambiguation. Many editors have worked on this one word at a time. Perhaps the editors who have an interest in this page could work on it too. --Steven J. Anderson 21:17, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Specifically links that are not dead, but go to a page which is incorrect for the subject at hand.-Nathan Schmidt P 9:14 ,25 Nov 2014 (CST)
Is one section at a time a step forward? I did the casting section (I didn't add/keep redlinks, though, partly because many of them are already discussed in the Casting article). Kingdon 22:13, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Organization[edit]

Isn't knurling more relevant to the "Finishing" section rather than the "Turning" section? (I don't feel strongly enough to just move it, though.) Dan Griscom 11:23, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I could be persuaded otherwise, but it seems to me that it fits better in "Turning". I guess because it can be done with a lathe. But then does knurl rolling fit under "Stamping" or "Coining" or some place like that? Maybe "finishing" isn't so bad (although it strikes me as cutting a bit more deeply into the surface than the other techniques currently there). I don't know. No such classification can be perfect. Perhaps there is a non-wikipedia classification we should base it on. Kingdon 19:23, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

re-name and move content to new articles[edit]

This article should be re-named Taxonomy of production processes in metals manufacturing and then three new articles would need to be created:


Taxonomy of production processes in plastics manufacturing

Taxonomy of production processes in glass manufacturing

Taxonomy of production processes in timber manufacturing

203.108.140.130 (talk) 07:03, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright concerns[edit]

This article was tagged as a copyright problem on February 2nd, here. I have done a google book search through the text in question, here, and have been unable to verify that this article replicates material from that book. Lacking evidence of infringement, I have restored the text. If further steps are necessary, please follow the additional processes at Wikipedia:Contact us/Article problem/Copyright and be sure to provide enough information to substantiate your claim of copyright ownership. If further evidence can be provided on this talk page, it may be appropriate to relist the matter for investigation at the copyright problems board by tagging the article {{copyvio|url=see talk}}. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:15, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Data collected from the original source[edit]

Someone went to the trouble to re-type this information from the original source at this location: http://adl.serveftp.org/skdb/taxonomy.yaml -- kanzure (talk) 13:43, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]