Talk:List of parks in Singapore

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Singapore Low‑importance

	Singapore portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Singapore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Singapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

This article is written in Singaporean English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, centre, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Untitled[edit]

How I wish that parks and other places in Singapore don't have boring names like Neighbourhood 2 Park, or Ang Mo Kio Ave 2.

There should be a push to move away from such boring and unimaginative places. We can honour exemplary Singaporeans or name them after places.

Does the image of the sign say much and is it necessary? I don't see what it contributes to the article's meaning. At least the other two images show examples of what parks in Singapore look like and their environment.

Inclusion criteria[edit]

Is there a way to get an exhaustive list rather than rely on "and have articles on Wikipedia" as an inclusion criterion? --Base (talk) 13:30, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The drop-down on https://www.nparks.gov.sg/gardens-parks-and-nature/parks-and-nature-reserves has a very long list. Reywas92^Talk 20:58, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

375 items. It isn't a short list, but does not seem to be something unmanageable. Of course I don't expect that they are all notable to have their own Wikipedia articles, but I am fairly sure they can be squeezed into the list (and possible also have a Wikidata item each). --Base (talk) 19:26, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]