Talk:List of spiral galaxies

NGC 891

note: the thumbnail for NGC 891 is a picture of the wrong galaxy (click through to the main article for this galaxy to see what it really looks like) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.119.233.130 (talk) 04:19, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Distance removal

I removed the columns with the distances for several reasons:

• Many of the numbers were unreferenced.
• Many of the referenced numbers came from bogus references, including amateur astronomy websites. In particular, the seds.org website is unreliable.
• Extragalactic distances are very uncertain; they are difficult to measure or to calculate with precision. Even the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database has problems. For example, compare their measurement for the distance to the Sombrero Galaxy with what astronomers have measured (as can be found in the references in the Wikipedia article on the Sombrero Galaxy).
• Formal distances have not been measured to most spiral galaxies. As noted in the example with the Sombrero Galaxy, applying the Hubble law is tricky (given the presence of the Virgo Cluster), so calculations of the distance based on redshift are inappropriate.

Please do not add distances back to this article. At the very least, discuss the situation with me before doing so. Dr. Submillimeter 21:54, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Dr.Submm quit Wikipedia, so that message no longer applies. 70.29.213.241 (talk) 13:12, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

I'd like to have distance information even if some data is not accurate. Yelizariev (talk) 12:20, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Can I suggest inclusion of NGC 1672 as a Spiral Galaxy

NGC 1672 is a Barred Spiral Galaxy much like NGC 1300, in fact NGC 1672 is refered to as The Barred Galaxy. NGC 1300 is included on this list.

The general Description for NGC 1672:

The center of the galaxy contains a high surface brightness bar, and four filament-like spiral arms extend outward from the ends of this bar. The spiral arms are asymmetric; one of the arms in the northeast part of the disk is significantly brighter than its counterpart on the other side. The spiral arms also contain numerous star formation regions, some of which may be as large as 4′′

I am not as experienced as of yet to change these things myself, particularly when doing an addition to a Boxed Graph. Can someone make the addition of NGC 1672 to this list. This omission is an error. Thanks!

TBIRD7777 (talk) 16:43, 4 July 2008 (UTC)TBIRD7777TBIRD7777 (talk) 16:43, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

File:NGC 628.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

	An image used in this article, File:NGC 628.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do?
	Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:28, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Fair use candidate from Commons: File:NGC 628.jpg

The file File:NGC 628.jpg, used on this page, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons and re-uploaded at File:NGC 628.jpg. It should be reviewed to determine if it is compliant with this project's non-free content policy, or else should be deleted and removed from this page. Commons fair use upload bot (talk) 03:04, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

File:NGC5257+NGC5258-small.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:NGC5257+NGC5258-small.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests January 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:39, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Bode'sGalaxy.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Bode'sGalaxy.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests January 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:05, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Why not the large page?

Are all of these in the main list List of galaxies? I suggest expanding List of galaxies with this info.121.166.132.237 (talk) 09:35, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

That makes no sense. This page is for spiral galaxies, not all galaxies, so the "large page" is not specialized for spirals, so many of these spirals would not appear there at all. Rather, we should expand this page with the sections of the "large list" like most distant, least distant, most massive, least massive sections. -- 67.70.35.17 (talk) 08:50, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of spiral galaxies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050222063047/http://www.seds.org/~spider/ngc/ngc.cgi?2715 to http://www.seds.org/~spider/ngc/ngc.cgi?2715

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:51, 2 January 2018 (UTC)