Talk:List of star systems within 20–25 light-years

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Astronomy: Astronomical objects Mid‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.

SCR J0740−4257?[edit]

I can't find any reference to SCR J0740−4257 (listed as 23.5 LY from Sol). Is this a real system? Does anyone have a reference for it? Nothing I can find on it on the RECONS web site despite its RECONS catalog number, and SIMBAD gives an invalid number format error. --Dave Seagraves (talk) 21:55, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is a real star.[1] Looking for sources...I suspect that given the similarities this is a Wikipedia mirror...this is a good reference. --JorisvS (talk) 22:33, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gliese 408 not Binary?[edit]

The page shows Gliese 408 (Ross 104) as a binary [A B], but a link to the detail article indicates it is a single star (as does Simbad and ARICNS). Maybe it was thought to be a binary at one time; when the page was first set up? Tesseract501 (talk) 04:45, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Given that we apparently were using the wrong number, my guess is that we just had the wrong information. I'd like to check the Gaia data just to be sure, just can't ever remember where the actual raw data is stored... Primefac (talk) 09:23, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]