Talk:List of suicides attributed to bullying

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Title[edit]

The current title is List of suicides that have been attributed to bullying. Should we simplify that to List of suicides that have been attributed to bullying? Thoughts? Thanks. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 16:41, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NLIST applies[edit]

Please don't list folks that are not notable here. WP:NLIST applies to this article too. Toddst1 (talk) 20:32, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of suicides that have been attributed to bullying. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:29, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of suicides that have been attributed to bullying. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:12, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bias and Libel[edit]

This page is grotesquely biased, with numerous assertions like "due to bullying" amounting to nothing more than allegations and speculations masquerading as facts.

Furthermore, the statement "Two girls, ages 14 and 12, encouraged others to fight Sedwick, and sent her electronic messages encouraging her to kill herself." amounts to LIBEL, given that the the younger was never even accused of doing so by the cops and given that no proof was ever found the older sent any such message (despite social media subpoenas producing thousands of pages). The libel is all the more egregious given that law enforcement never accused the girls of any wrongdoing AFTER Rebecca left school SEVEN MONTHS BEFORE her suicide -- thus blaming the children for the death assumes Rebecca killed herself over a conflict SEVEN MONTHS OLD with ZERO evidence that either girl was at all on her mind the day she killed herself (she was actually despondent over her online boyfriend cheating on her). The State Attorney refused to file charges against either girl and journalists reviewing the 300+ pages of investigative reports reported an astonishing lack of evidence of bullying coupled with presence numerous stress factors unrelated to peer bullying.

This entire page is a total sham. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shores of bohemia (talkcontribs) 13:51, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gap[edit]

Why is there such a gap between the first entry and the second? That's 120 years. Surely some notable suicides that have been attributed to bullying occurred between 1877 and 1997. --Auric talk 14:46, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Suicide of Emilie Olsen[edit]

I was thinking that should there be an article regarding the Suicide of Emilie Olsen, there are a lot of references to news websites that discuss her suicide--Anonymous1941 (talk) 05:30, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Should this be renamed "List of suicides attributed to bullying" ???[edit]

I think a shorter title is more suitable. Sxologist (talk) 10:04, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I'll try to accomplish that. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 15:35, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Dr. Vogel (talk) 15:39, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Inclusion criteria and alphabetizing issues[edit]

This list has become a garbage list and needs clear inclusion criteria, per Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists#Common selection criteria: "Every entry meets the notability criteria for its own non-redirect article in the English Wikipedia." Each entry should be notable in its own right, and to prevent more misuse of the list (especially because of the very sensitive legal and BLP issues involved) we should require that each entry is notable enough for its own article, IOW notable enough that the article has survived the typical AfD attempts which many, if not most, new articles are subjected.

Misuse of redlinks places an unfair burden on editors here who are then required to double-check all the sources used. That isn't right. The burden for proving notability belongs to the one wishing to add an entry to the list, so let them create the article. If it becomes accepted, then they can add it to this list.

Accordingly, I am going to start paring the list down and alphabetizing it by last name. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 15:52, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Potential vandalism on Tyler Long's section[edit]

I removed the part that claimed he was gay and suffered bullying because of that. The provided sources only mention his Asperger's Syndrome, and that he was called homophobic slurs, but no mention of him being gay. I googled it and could find no source that supports this claim. It's possible the editor made a mistake or a false assumption, but it's entirely possible that whoever added that had malicious intent Hipotecas (talk) 03:08, 17 June 2022 (UTC). [reply]

Relevant move discussion[edit]

There is a discussion about moving the name of this particular article. Persons watching this list may be interested, as perhaps there are precedents in naming conventions which could add insight. Bluerasberry (talk) 16:21, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]