Talk:List of surgeons

This page was proposed for deletion by RupertMillard (talk · contribs) on 15 May 2009 with the comment:
Completely arbitrary to group surgeons with cardiologists.
It was seconded by ceyockey (talk · contribs) on 22 May 2009 with the comment:
Agreed - scope is much larger than the current categorization under. If necessary, create lists which are scoped to the present categories (e.g. List of South African surgeons).
It was contested by ThaddeusB (talk · contribs) on 22 May 2009 with the comment:
seems to be a valid list topic - please clean it up and/or add specific criteria for inclusion if you want

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Split[edit]

i have not yet seen a list on wikipedia that wants to be split as much as this. WHY surgeons and cardiologist? Why not dermatologists and paediatricians? or urologists and psychiatrists? etc. etc. etc. i was just about to delete an israeli for not being a surgeon when i noticed the subtitle. it's ridiculous and unless someone can show me a very compelling reason why not, guess what?Toyokuni3 (talk) 04:58, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]