Talk:Little Cottonwood Canyon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

The number of photos on this page and the layout of them rather detracts from the page. Most good wiki pages don't have photos lining both sides of the page. Abandonedhero 16:18, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed[edit]

One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from this URL: http://www.utah.com/byways/little_cottonwood.htm. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:16, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Photos at bottom of page and peacock terms[edit]

Not quite sure why these color photos were added to bottom of article. I understand there was an earlier issue about placement of photos and this may have been the solution. Consider choosing one or two to drop in the article and delete the others. Also, on the subject of copy editing, I suspect if all of the peacock terms were deleted, the first paragraph would be the only copy left. This article reads a little too much like a promotion piece. Thanks, Cortina2 (talk) 04:19, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]