Talk:Little Criminals (film)

This article was nominated for deletion on October 17 2006. The result of the discussion was keep.

Canada: Cinema Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the joint Canadian film and cinema task force

Film: Canadian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Canadian cinema task force.

Untitled[edit]

Why does wikipedia doesn't want an article about this movie? Is it because it had licence issues?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by repsaj (talk • contribs) .

It isn't that Wikipedia wants to delete the article, it's just that, I, a fellow editor first nommed it for speedy. Not because of license issues. My reasoning is that because it wasn't released, it's not notable enough to warrant it's own article. However, another editor thought it should not be speedily deleted. Since that was the case, I decided to basically bring it up for peer review, through a process called "deletion review". For 5 days anyone interested can discuss the merits of the article, and whether or not it should stay on Wikipedia. Your input in the discussion is welcomed. TheRingess 17:51, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Allright. I understand that when you read that it has never been released it's a bit hard to find it relevant for Wikipedia, but this movie is a little masterpiece (debute role of Brendan Fletcher and in my opinion his best role). Great acting and the movie covers a big social issue, that of kid criminals. I think it's a shame that people can't find any good information on a movie this great simply because it is never officially released. repsaj

No harm no foul. I actually changed my vote on the discussion page. You might wish to particpate in it. There is a link to the discussion in the article. TheRingess 18:06, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

When is this article not a stub anymore? If I compare it with Wayne's World 2 it contains as much relevant information. Repsaj 11:47, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Littlecriminals.jpg[edit]

Image:Littlecriminals.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:41, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]