Talk:Local government in England

Out of date following Localism Act

I think this statement:

"Councils also have a general power to "promote economic, social and environmental well-being" of their area. However, like all public bodies, they are limited by the doctrine of ultra vires, and may only do things that common law or an Act of Parliament specifically or generally allows for — in contrast to the earlier incorporated municipal corporations which were treated as natural persons and could undertake whatever activities they wished to. Councils may promote Local Acts in Parliament to grant them special powers. For example, Kingston upon Hull had for many years a municipally owned telephone company, Kingston Communications."

Is out of date following the enactment of the Localism Act 2011. In the act the 'General Power of Competence" basically gives local government bodies the status of a natural person "A local authority has power to do anything that individuals generally may do", in addition to any intra vires statutory or common law powers they may have. Except borrowing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SandyMcF (talk • contribs) 16:12, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just added archive links to one external link on Local government in England. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071006005906/http://www.hinckley-bosworth.gov.uk/pp/service/directory.asp?id=4938&Tree=4884&DetailID=1529 to http://www.hinckley-bosworth.gov.uk/pp/service/directory.asp?id=4938&Tree=4884&DetailID=1529

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:51, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified 2 external links on Local government in England. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071025055647/http://www.info4local.gov.uk/ to http://www.info4local.gov.uk/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130929083926/http://www.lga.gov.uk/ to http://www.lga.gov.uk/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:41, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

complex, with the distribution of functions varying according to the local arrangements

The encyclopedia's job is to explain the complex. It should be possible briefly to describe the pattern of local government divisions. "There are x types of local authority. Of these, y are similar in that they control almost everything. The z types of LA are similar in that responsibilities are shared between n tiers of government." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.136.228.205 (talk) 13:04, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

POV problems with the 'Funding shortfall' section

Here is a list of some of the unattributed opinions in this section, which contravene WP:YESPOV and WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV:

1. It is feared many local authority services will close or be cut because the government has not increased local authority funding in 2017-2018.
2. Children at risk get inadequate help because councils are under resourced.
3. What help children at risk get depends on the postcode lottery and varies between local authorities.
4. Swimming pools, sports halls and leisure centres are at risk of closure due to lack of funding.
5. Councils are running deficits because there is not enough funding to protect vulnerable children.
6. This is seen as short sighted as it will increase pressure on the NHS.
7. Youngsters who can afford it are increasingly using private drug addiction clinics and it is feared those who cannot afford to go private are getting involved in gangs.
8. It is feared this will lead to increased unplanned pregnancies and abortions.
9. Further drastic cuts are feared for 2019.

No opinions should be stated as fact and all opinions need to be attributed as to whose opinions they are - this should be explicit and not left to the reader to unravel from what follows or from sources referenced. -- DeFacto (talk). 16:35, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Proxima Centauri, I see that you removed the "unbalanced" tag I added, and without commenting here. It is not the accuracy of the source that is the problem, it is the one-sided and unattributed opinion that it is being used to support that is the problem. Please restore the tag per WP:DETAG until the balance problem has been resolved. -- DeFacto (talk). 00:47, 31 December 2018 (UTC)