Talk:Location View

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Japan Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 20:11, May 10, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Maps Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Maps and Cartography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MapsWikipedia:WikiProject MapsTemplate:WikiProject MapsMaps articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.
	This article had an importance automatically assigned to it. Once it has been checked by a human, please remove `\|autoi=yes`.

Cited[edit]

Cited from newspaper, TV program.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.217.109.219 (talk • contribs) 17:52, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The links added to External links are in Japanese which is why I have added the {{jp icon}}. English language sources would really help.♦Tangerines♦·Talk 17:14, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, there are many Japanese articles about LOCATION VIEW service, but I think English article is only one, cited at External Link —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.217.109.219 (talk) 17:46, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the unattributed claim regarding "90%" coverage of Tokyo. Passive voice attributions (e.g., "it is said that") are extremely common in Japanese journalism, but are generally frowned upon in most Western media. It is not fitting for a wikipedia article. It WOULD be interesting to get a real cited fact in there regarding Location view's coverage. That should be easy for a native Japanese reader to find, so please find it! :-)--Gregapan (talk) 23:58, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I think the request for citations referred to the lack of citations for the INFORMATION contained in the article, not citations for the links! The link citations seem unnecessary... --Gregapan (talk) 00:38, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Trivial "Locations" section?[edit]

I have tagged the "Locations" section, as I don't see the point in listing arbitrary spots in Tokyo and other cities that are covered by the map service. If the service covers Tokyo, then surely it goes without saying that these and thousands of other locations in Tokyo can be seen, so there is no need to mention them by name. I think it would be more encyclopedic to list the cities that are currently covered by the service. --DAJF (talk) 02:16, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Location View. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:19, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]