	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: Libertarianism

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Libertarianism portal This article is supported by WikiProject Libertarianism (assessed as Low-importance).

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Article needs major work

The last paragraph is not inaccurate, but poorly written. Citations would be nice, but it would be more important not to talk about libertarians as a group, but to talk about libertarianism as a philosophy.

Griswold has nothing to do with this discussion. The observation that after West Coast Hotel there is no right under contractual freedom to sell contraceptives does not mean that no right exists. In any case it is a bad example, probably wrong on the law, and very confusing -- deleted.

As for the appendage at the end; why should it be noted that those last two cases were decided during this era?

Removed unreferenced tag: unwarranted[edit]

I removed an "unreferenced" tag from this article. While more references can surely be found for this subject, and a much broader article written, the article cites references in text: specifically, several US Supreme Court decisions, each of which has its own article with full citations available. The tag does not belong because the references are incorporated into the text. - Smerdis of Tlön 13:53, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reference to West Coast Hotel v. Parrish dissent[edit]

Added a reference to the West Coast Hotel v. Parrish dissent at the end of the libertarian-view paragraph as requested in an HTML comment in the article text. Removed comment from article text. Doonhamer | Banter 05:33, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Major Hole![edit]

I think someone needs to add a whole section to this thing. A good bridge to what I think should be added is someone's question, "why should it be noted that those last two cases were decided during this era."

There needs to be a section disscussing the era's relationship with substantive due process. Lochner, and the era, basically depend on substantive due process, but that isn't in here. So, we need those last two cases to discuss this important issue and fill a giant hole in the article. Anyone willing to do the work? Piratejosh85 (talk) 05:07, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Lochner era[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Lochner era's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "McKenna419":

From West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish: McKenna, Marian C. (2002). Franklin Roosevelt and the Great Constitutional War: The Court-packing Crisis of 1937. New York, NY: Fordham University Press. p. 419. ISBN 9780823221547.
From Judicial Procedures Reform Bill of 1937: McKenna, at 419.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:55, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]