Talk:Lockheed D-21

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleLockheed D-21 has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 5, 2011Good article nomineeListed
May 19, 2011WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
Current status: Good article

Related development link[edit]

There is no point to any related development links in the See also section if they're already linked in the lede of the article.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:03, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Possible fifth operational flight?[edit]

Several sources I've read claim that there were actually five operational flights in the D-21 program, and that the exact details of the fifth are still secret. Naturally, due to the very nature of these rumors they may be impossible to confirm or deny, but I wanted to bring this up here before putting it in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.81.176.133 (talk) 00:06, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Be prepared to defend your sources. Self-published books, etc., will be deleted as not meeting WP:RS.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:41, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This article, which was written by a former SR-71 crew chief, mentions there being five operational D-21 missions but says nothing about the nature of the fifth one. I have encountered mention of a fifth, classified D-21 flight elsewhere as well, but mostly on message boards and forums that do not meet Wikipedia's standards. It's certainly possible, since some aspects of the SR-71/A-12 family's operational history are still secret. For example, the SR-71's top speed is officially Mach 3.3, but reports say it could reach Mach 3.5. An extra D-21 flight or two seems like the sort of thing that they might still be hiding. unsigned comment added by 24.224.66.196 (talk) 00:06, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
That article (http://sr71.com/srlink~1.htm) is only a web page with a long list of links on it. This isn't even a decent reference and there's no direct way to check on this supposed 5th mission. -Fnlayson (talk) 21:52, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]