Talk:Lockheed Martin FB-22

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Military history: Aviation / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Citation[edit]

A citation of source for the remarks I added will be provided soon. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Klauth (talk • contribs) 18:03, 14 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

F-117A[edit]

Isn't this also a stealth bomber replacement? (Yeah, the F-117A, so called stealth fighter, which only bombs) 70.51.10.109 08:34, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The 2018 interim bomber will compliment the B-2 and other current bombers. The FB-22's range is only like 1/4 of the B-2 and other current heavy bombers. The interim bomber will replace the F-117, I guess. The F-35 will cover some of that too. The F-117 has missiles as well. -Fnlayson 17:17, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The bomb part is largely right. The F-117 mainly carried laser guided bombs. -Fnlayson (talk) 15:37, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And it's also retired now. Spartan198 (talk) 07:39, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rename article[edit]

This article should be renamed to "Lockheed Martin FB-22" to follow WP:Naming conventions (aircraft) guidelines. In other words

FB-22 → Lockheed Martin FB-22

Any reasonable arguments not to rename it? -Fnlayson (talk) 21:09, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think the reason it hasn't been renamed that before is that Boeing is the primary proponent of the variant, and would probably be the lead contractor/manufacturer if it were to be produced. - BilCat (talk) 21:35, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, that's a good one. I have not yet run across anything on Boeing involvement with the FB-22. Other than with the F-22, I've only seen mention of a Boeing-LM partnership for the subsonic New Generation Bomber. -Fnlayson (talk) 23:08, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Has the consensus changed here? Cause the article's been moved. - BilCat (talk) 04:09, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

...this would be an oops on my part, I didn't see this before moving it. >.< - The Bushranger (talk) 04:27, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, BR. I looked in the article,and there's no mention of Boeing in it that I could find anyway. I'll see what I can dig up this week, and we'll go from there. - BilCat (talk) 04:32, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FB-22 Strike Raptor[edit]

I think it should be called “Lockheed Martin FB-22 Strike Raptor. 50.75.39.166 (talk) 21:36, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable source(s) are needed to support renaming this article. -Fnlayson (talk) 21:41, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]