Talk:Lockheed P-7

Military history: Aviation / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Aviation: Aircraft C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

C

This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Huh?[edit]

Ths article states: "In October 1988, the U.S. Navy announced that Lockheed won the competition, as the company's proposal was significantly lower than that of the competitors." Lower? How? Fewer pages? Closer to the ground? In what way was their proposal "lower"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.158.48.18 (talk) 13:56, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The bid was lower in price/costs. - BilCat (talk) 14:39, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Then perhaps the article should reflect that... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.51.66.32 (talk) 03:39, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lockheed P-7. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130111182157/http://www.fas.org/programs/ssp/man/uswpns/air/asw/p7.html to https://fas.org/programs/ssp/man/uswpns/air/asw/p7.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:30, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Modified 737?[edit]

I was an engineer who worked on the GE27, and as I recall it, the Boeing entry to the anti-sub competition was actually a modified 757. OK, yeah, it took about 10 seconds to find a reference that supports my memory. 98.232.40.141 (talk) 07:19, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]